Proposition 23: Kidney dialysis clinic rules

The basics

What would Proposition 23 do?

Require kidney dialysis clinics to have at least one physician present during all operating hours, and to report infection data to the state. It also would require that operators get approval from the state’s health department before closing a clinic, and prohibit clinics from discriminating against patients based on insurance type.

Why am I voting on this?

The number of people with kidney failure who require dialysis treatment continues to grow; about 80,000 Californians depend on it. That also means a boom in the dialysis industry. 

A powerful labor union, Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, has targeted these companies. 

Two years ago, the union introduced a ballot initiative that would have essentially limited clinics’ profits. After a very expensive battle, voters ultimately sided with the dialysis companies. The union said it would be back, so this is round two.

Supporters say

Kidney patients deserve better treatment than what they receive from many dialysis clinics, and these high profit companies haven’t invested enough in patient safety. The removal of people’s blood during dialysis treatment puts enormous strain on people’s bodies and leaves them vulnerable to medical crises. So having a licensed physician on site at all times —not just sometimes — means that during emergencies, a physician can respond immediately.

Opponents say

The proposition is unnecessary, as clinics already report infection data to the federal government. They also already have the necessary medical staff to keep patients safe, including a medical director. But adding physicians around the clock would only increase costs for clinics, pushing them to reduce hours or possibly close. What this is, at heart, is a union ploy to pressure clinics and organize dialysis workers.

Who's for it:

  • Service Employees International Union United Health Care Workers

  • California Labor Federation

  • California Democratic Party

Who's against it:

  • DaVita

  • Fresenius Medical Care

  • California Medical Association

  • California State Conference NAACP

23
Now playing
14
Now playing
15
Now playing
16
Now playing
17
Now playing
18
Now playing
19
Now playing
20
Now playing
21
Now playing
22
Now playing
24
Now playing
25
Now playing

Our sponsors

Finances

How is this being bankrolled?

Major Donors in Support

  • SEIU United Healthcare Workers West Political Issues Committee

  • Service Employees International Union - United Healthcare Workers West

  • California Democratic Party

Major Donors in Opposition

  • DaVita

  • Fresenius Medical Care

  • US Renal Care, Inc

Gimme Props Quiz
Click to show more
Dive deeper
Relevant Stories
CalMatters Coverage
Election Feed