Republish
Congress must protect public lands, including the Pacific Crest Trail. Californians should lead the effort
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Congress must protect public lands, including the Pacific Crest Trail. Californians should lead the effort
Share this:
By Liz Bergeron, Special to CalMatters
Liz Bergeron is executive director Pacific Crest Trail Association, lbergeron@pcta.org. She wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
Summer hikers, bikers, paddlers, campers, bird watchers, climbers and horseback riders abandon California’s cities to marvel in mountainous glory of the Sierra Nevada. The love for the Range of Light is no less when the snow falls.
However, years of fiscal neglect by Congress for our public lands have taken their toll.
There is about $20 billion worth of deferred maintenance on the nation’s public lands and waters, including $11.9 billion in national parks and $5.2 billion in national forests.
This means roads, trails, bridges, trailheads and other facilities are in disrepair. So far, bills in the House and Senate address the backlog only in national parks, but some members want to add the Forest Service.
Additionally, one of America’s most important funding sources for conservation, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, continues to be underfunded. Created in 1965, the Land and Water Conservation Fund allows Congress to spend up to $900 million annually for conservation projects. The money is not from taxpayers, but from lease payments on offshore oil and gas development. Congress has allocated the full amount only once.
Americans deserve better.
Shortchanging our public lands is shameful and shortsighted given their value. According to newly released government data, outdoor recreation accounts for 2.2 percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product and is growing faster than the overall American economy, surpassing other significant sectors including agriculture, mining, utilities, and chemical products manufacturing. Outdoor recreation supports nearly 600,000 jobs in California.
The simple fact is that when public lands go unfunded or underfunded, it’s hard to take care of them. Deteriorating roads mean that access to public lands are diminished. When people can’t get to the places where they want to recreate, they stop caring for them. That’s why the Pacific Crest Trail Association not only supports tackling the maintenance backlog, we support full and permanent funding of the Land and Water Conservation Fund.
Public lands are our heritage. They give wildlife a home and provide us with clean air and water. Out there, we find peace and reflect on what’s important. We feel alive. We must invest in them for our own enjoyment and for the benefit of future generations.
This summer, the Pacific Crest Trail Association, The Trust for Public Land, the U.S. Forest Service, the Michigan-California Timber Co. and the Wyss Foundation partnered to protect 17 miles of the Pacific Crest Trail along the Trinity Divide in Northern California.
The timber company realized that the best use of its 10,300 acres—which includes the headwaters of four rivers, 10 lakes and mountain views—was for recreation and protecting vital habitat, not timber production. A contribution of $10 million from the Land and Water Conservation Fund made the purchase possible.
There’s still a great need to preserve places for recreation and wildlife. Our National Trails System, which includes 11 national scenic and 19 national historic trails, is far from being completed.
Decades after congressional designation, trail corridors still run across miles of private property. Even now, 10% of the Pacific Crest Trail remains on private property. Many miles are protected only by easement, oftentimes no wider than 20 feet. If we don’t act, pristine hillsides along the trail could one day be covered with buildings or power lines. That’s not the experience Congress intended for the PCT.
The Land and Water Conservation Fund is the country’s best hope for slowing the inevitable development that is severely influencing California’s most wild places. And it’s money well spent.
Members of Congress realized the importance of the Land and Water Conservation Fund when they permanently reauthorized it earlier this year. But they didn’t go far enough. Bipartisan bills pending in the House and Senate would fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund.
The House bill has enough co-sponsors to pass, Democratic and Republican alike, including 45 of California’s 46 Democrats, minus Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Unfortunately, not all California members of Congress have signed on. Missing are the state’s six Republicans, including Doug LaMalfa, Tom McClintock, Paul Cook, Devin Nunes, Kevin McCarthy, and Ken Calvert, many of whom have the PCT in their districts. We urge them to join this effort to protecting our public lands.
House and Senate committees have approved the Land and Water Conservation Fund and maintenance backlog bills. Both houses now must vote on the solutions to these frustrating and recurring funding questions.
Let’s urge members of Congress to come together to take care of this business for the good of all Americans, as we all enjoy our public lands and benefit from them.
_____
Liz Bergeron is executive director Pacific Crest Trail Association, lbergeron@pcta.org. She wrote this commentary for CalMatters.