People in sweaters and warm clothing walk with picket signs on signs outside an Amazon warehouse in front of an Amazon van parked. The signs the people are holding say, “ Amazon is Unfair.”
A union worker blocks an Amazon delivery truck from leaving the warehouse at Amazon Warehouse DCK6 in San Francisco on Dec. 19, 2024. Photo by Jungho Kim for CalMatters

From CalMatters’ Capitol reporter Jeanne Kuang: 

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday signed a new law attempting to have California take over the role of the National Labor Relations Board if it is hobbled under President Donald Trump.

Under Assembly Bill 288, workers with pending cases before the board, including pending union elections, could ask the state to hear the case instead if:

  • The National Labor Relations Act is overturned;
  • The national board is blocked from acting by Trump or the courts; 
  • The board’s regional offices take longer than six months to issue a decision; 
  • Or cases appealed up to the national board take longer than a year to be resolved. 

The federal government’s National Labor Relations Board oversees private-sector workers’ rights to unionize and collectively bargain; California only has jurisdiction over labor disputes among public sector workers and farmworkers. 

The California Labor Federation sponsored the new law as an answer to Trump’s disputed firing of a board member early this year. Without that member, the board lacked a quorum and could not fully resolve disputes between unions and employers. Labor groups see the move as an attack on union rights. Several major corporations facing a unionizing workforce — including Amazon, Starbucks and SpaceX — have also argued in legal filings that the national board should be declared unconstitutional. 

  • Newsom, in a statement: “With the federal government not only asleep at the wheel, but driving into incoming traffic, it is more important than ever that states stand up to protect workers and ensure they have a path to defend their right to organize and collectively bargain.”

The new law is likely to draw legal challenges from the Trump administration. In August the national board’s acting general counsel William Cowen released a statement saying such state laws would likely be considered unconstitutional because states cannot take on powers reserved for the federal government. Last month he sued New York state over a similar law.


Focus on Inland Empire: Each Wednesday, CalMatters Inland Empire reporter Aidan McGloin surveys the big stories from that part of California. Read his newsletter and sign up here to receive it.



UCLA wins big

A person in glasses holds a dark blue sign that reads "KILL THE CUTS SAVE LIVES" in white and yellow letters during a protest. Other protesters holding similar signs and a blurred banner are visible in the background.
Participants rallying against the Trump administration’s cuts to research funding on the UCLA campus in Los Angeles on April 8, 2025. Photo by Jules Hotz for CalMatters

In a striking victory for UCLA, the Trump administration has restored nearly all of the 500 National Institutes of Health grants it initially suspended from UCLA health science researchers in July, writes CalMatters’ Mikhail Zinshteyn.

A federal judge ordered the grants to be restored last week, and the U.S. Department of Justice submitted an update on the status of the grant restorations Monday. The judge’s order follows a similar order in August, which directed the federal National Science Foundation to restore 300 UCLA grants it had also suspended in July.

The Trump administration had frozen 800 science grants that totaled more than $500 million after accusing UCLA of not doing enough to combat antisemitism during last year’s pro-Palestine protests. The grants funded research related to life-saving drugs, dementia and various other projects across the country. 

Despite the victory, UCLA is still grappling with the administration’s bid to force the public university into a $1.2-billion settlement, which a group of UC faculty and staff are suing to stop.

Read more here.

What the Menendez brothers’ case tells us about celebrity and prison

Photo illustration of Lyle and Erik Menendez, set against a fragmented collage of newspaper headlines and paparazzi
Illustration by Gabriel Hongsdusit, CalMatters

The media frenzy surrounding the Menendez brothers’ recent parole hearings underscores how fame can be a double-edged sword when it comes to California’s justice system, writes CalMatters’ Joe Garcia.

Nearly 30 years ago, a jury convicted Erik and Lyle Menendez for the 1989 killing of their parents in Beverly Hills. The high-profile murders have brought intense media scrutiny to the court case, which came to a head in August, when the brothers were up for parole.

The brothers were ultimately denied parole, and have a possibility for a new hearing in 18 months. But in one way, they may have benefited from the attention: They were initially eligible for parole only because they were recently resentenced from life without parole through an arbitrary and subjective review process.

But if the brothers had been found suitable for parole, Newsom would also have had to decide whether to veto their release. Newsom has revoked grants of parole to other notorious offenders before, citing public safety risks, though one legal expert says the cases’ notoriety could also be a factor.

Read more here.

And lastly: CA’s lightning strikes and housing market

A wide view of dark and gray thunder clouds as lightning strikes over a mountainside with Joshua trees, rocks, and boulders around the frame.
A view of a lightning strike at Joshua Tree National Park on Aug. 26, 2025. Photo by Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu, via Getty Images

Last month, dozens of California fires followed a burst of dry lightning on Labor Day. CalMatters’ Rachel Becker and video strategy director Robert Meeks have a video segment on why researchers say this will likely happen more often in the state as part of our partnership with PBS SoCal. Watch it here.

And check out another video from CalMatters’ Ben Christopher and Robert about the various factors behind California’s sluggish housing market. Watch it here.

SoCalMatters airs at 5:58 p.m. weekdays on PBS SoCal.



Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.


Half a billion dollars for a sinking CA highway? Newsom may OK it // The Sacramento Bee

CA, other states again sue Trump administration for tying aid to immigration laws // Los Angeles Times

CA extends cap-and-trade, as Indigenous nations grapple with the trade-offs // Grist

Salmon reach new milestone after CA’s massive dam removal // San Francisco Chronicle

Trump says the military will ‘straighten out’ SF // The San Francisco Standard

Trump vows to host the ‘greatest games’ in LA, a city that’s felt his wrath // The Guardian

Ninth Circuit unanimously rejects San Diego’s attempt to reinstate beach yoga ban // The San Diego Union-Tribune

Lynn La is the newsletter writer for CalMatters, focusing on California’s top political, policy and Capitol stories every weekday. She produces and curates WhatMatters, CalMatters’ flagship daily newsletter...