1. One weekly email, all the Golden State news
  2. One email, all the Golden State news
  1. Get the news that matters to all Californians. Start every week informed.
  2. Get the news that matters to all Californians. Start every week informed.
By signing up, you agree to the terms.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  1. California, explained
  2. California, explained
  1. We’re a big state with big challenges. Each morning we explain the top issues and how Californians are trying to solve them.
  2. We’re a big state with big challenges. Each morning we explain the top issues.
By signing up, you agree to the terms.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Nonprofit, nonpartisan state news.
  • About Us
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
About Newsletters Search
  • Politics
  • Justice
  • Environment
  • Economy
  • Health
  • Housing
  • Education
  • Inequality
  • Legislator Tracker
  • Commentary
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Explainers
  • Series
  • Data & Trackers
  • Programs
    • CalMatters for Learning
    • Youth Journalism
    • College Journalism Network
    • California Divide
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletters
  • CalMatters en Español
  • About Us
    • Impact
    • News and Awards
    • Funding
    • Policies
    • Sponsorship
    • Our Team
    • Jobs
  • Inside the Newsroom
CalMatters is your nonprofit and nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to explaining how state government impacts our lives.
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Daily Archives: July 18, 2017

Assembly GOP Leader Chad Mayes and seven fellow Republicans cast vital votes to ensure passage of cap and trade in California.
Posted inClimate Change, Environment, Politics

Latest California innovation: A Republican case for cap and trade

by Laurel Rosenhall July 18, 2017June 23, 2020

In California, a deep blue state leading the charge to curb climate change, the question for many Republicans isn’t whether global warming is happening—it’s what kind of policies are best to address it.

The most debated portion of the Garcia bill involves an existing loophole under the current cap and trade law that allows industrial facilities to get around retrofitting old, less-efficient equipment by purchasing pollution offsets and continuing to emit. But in addressing one cap-and-trade loophole, Garcia’s bill appears to open another: While it requires local air boards to establish equipment retrofitting programs, because the original law’s language was not struck, facilities could continue to trade pollution credits in lieu of replacing older equipment. Such a program, known as RECLAIM, is operated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. During floor debate, Garcia made it clear that her bill did not intend to create that loophole, but the language remained in the version that passed.
Posted inEconomy, Environment

Newly passed pollution bill is ‘downpayment’ to environmental justice

by Julie Cart July 18, 2017June 23, 2020
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

About

  • Overview
  • Impact
  • Funding
  • News and Awards
  • Policies
  • Programs
  • Sponsorships
  • Our Team
  • Jobs
  • Contact Us

Topics

  • Politics
  • Justice
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Housing
  • Health
  • Commentary
  • Inequality

More

  • Donate
  • Newsletters
  • CalMatters en Español
  • Inside the Newsroom

General Inquiries

info@calmatters.org

Membership Inquiries

membership@calmatters.org

  1. Protect your nonprofit state news.
  1. Become a CalMatters member with a tax-deductible donation today to stay informed, bolster our journalism and expand how many people we reach across California.
Donate
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
© 2023 CalMatters. Proudly powered by Newspack by Automattic Privacy Policy