Republish
Newsom wildfire prevention claims undercut his credibility again
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Newsom wildfire prevention claims undercut his credibility again
Share this:
Gavin Newsom’s penchant for extravagant — and ultimately false — promises, predictions and claims of achievement makes him his own worst enemy.
His tendency was exhibited even before he became governor, most notably in his ludicrous 2018 campaign pledge that he would solve California’s chronic housing shortage by constructing 3.5 million new units by 2025.
A few months later, just after being inaugurated, he made another over-the-top promise that also haunts him, again illustrating how he self-inflicts wounds on his credibility.
One of Newsom’s first acts as governor was to declare an aggressive new wildfire prevention program, saying “everybody has had enough” and declaring that the state’s approach “fundamentally has to change.”
However, Capital Public Radio and National Public Radio’s California Newsroom last week reported finding a deep chasm between reality and what Newsom promised and later claimed to have achieved.
Their deep dive into wildfire prevention records “found the governor has misrepresented his accomplishments and even disinvested in wildfire prevention. The investigation found Newsom overstated, by an astounding 690%, the number of acres treated with fuel breaks and prescribed burns in the very forestry projects he said needed to be prioritized to protect the state’s most vulnerable communities. Newsom has claimed that 35 ‘priority projects’ carried out as a result of his executive order resulted in fire prevention work on 90,000 acres. But the state’s own data show the actual number is 11,399.”
Surfacing as the state faces another destructive fire season and Newsom faces a recall election, the revelations again portray a governor whose pronouncements tend to be as untrustworthy as they are self-serving.
That tendency was often on display during the many months in which he single-handedly managed the state’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Newsom was eager to show leadership by announcing, with some fanfare, deals to acquire much-needed masks to battle the disease. However, as CalMatters later reported, “In one case, the state yanked its money back after bankers raised suspicions about a $456.9 million wire transfer to a company called Blue Flame, an intended down payment for 100 million N95 masks (and) a subsequent deal to buy N95 masks from a company called BYD was delayed because federal health officials did not initially certify the masks.”
Repeatedly, Newsom would claim progress on COVID-19, lift some restrictions and then reimpose them when infections spiked, causing public confusion, devastating small businesses and fueling the recall drive.
The public radio reporters who uncovered the holes in Newsom’s wildfire prevention claims made numerous efforts to obtain the governor’s explanation, but were rebuffed.
Instead, the head of the state’s firefighting agency, Thom Porter, “acknowledged the figures cited by Newsom were incorrect and took responsibility for the governor’s misstatements. Porter, who stood behind Newsom at a series of press conferences where the governor boasted of his accomplishments, said Cal Fire had neither ‘done our job in educating the public, nor the governor’s office’ about how to talk about its wildfire prevention efforts.”
It’s a time-dishonored Capitol tradition: Something embarrasses a governor and an underling publicly shoulders the blame. It happened last year when Dr. Sonia Angell, head of the Department of Public Health, resigned after officials revealed a backlog of infection records that undercut Newsom’s public claims of progress against COVID-19.
Wildfires are a matter of life and death, and the Legislature owes the public a complete assessment of what’s being done, or not done, to mitigate the peril.
Legislative leaders should order state Auditor Elaine Howle, whose independence and thoroughness are unquestioned, to lay out the facts. Otherwise, they are complicit in the deception.
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters