Republish
California Public Records Act reforms should consider agency workload, too
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California Public Records Act reforms should consider agency workload, too
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Christine Wood
Christine Wood is a partner at Best Best & Krieger and leads the firm’s Advanced Records Center team, which supports clients’ public record and information requests.
Re: “Could Public Records Act be made more useful?“
Balanced Public Records Act reform is not just utilitarian, it is a necessity. Before we begin to fortify the PRA, let’s take a balanced look at what agencies face.
Larger municipalities in California receive thousands of requests annually. One receives as much as 9,000 requests annually – almost 30 every business day or about four an hour.
Some litigious or vengeful requesters use PRAs to exploit attorneys’ fees. In one instance, a petitioner bagged tens of thousands of public dollars filing writs for the sole purpose of collecting nuisance fees. Coupled with the disgruntled employees who use the PRA to burden agencies and increase costs, it is abundantly clear that reform is necessary.
Recent efforts by the Legislature to increase transparency have focused mostly on law enforcement records, but there never seems to be any interest in providing agencies a modicum of relief. As someone who treasures the fourth estate and its role in our democracy, I believe we can do both.