Republish
Brown may leave with two big projects on the bubble
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Brown may leave with two big projects on the bubble
Share this:
During Jerry Brown’s first stint as governor four decades ago, he was openly disdainful of big public works projects, often citing British economist E.F. Schumacher’s 1973 book, “Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered.”
Brown’s attitude manifested itself in a virtual halt to highway construction, which led to constant bickering with his fellow Democrats in the Legislature who wanted projects in their districts.
It also was widely seen as a repudiation of his father, Pat Brown, who as governor had fostered a massive expansion of highways, waterworks, college campuses and other forms of what we now call “infrastructure.”
The younger Brown did, however, push for building the last major link in his father’s California Water Plan, a 43-mile-long “peripheral canal” that would carry water around the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to San Joaquin Valley farms and fast-growing Southern California’s residential tracts.
Moreover, he did talk about some new kinds of public works, such as the state’s launching its own communications satellite – earning him the nickname of Governor Moonbeam – and a bullet train to link the northern and southern halves of the state.
None of it happened, however.
Although Brown won legislative approval of the peripheral canal, he failed to gain backing from two powerful constituencies – San Joaquin Valley farmers who thought it was inadequate and environmentalists who thought it went too far.
The two disparate groups formed an odd-bedfellows alliance and repealed the peripheral canal authorization in a 1982 referendum, just as Brown’s first governorship was ending.
The satellite and the bullet train never got beyond the talking phase.
When Brown became governor again in 2011, a bullet train project had been launched with voter approval and a successor to the peripheral canal, twin tunnels beneath the Delta, was being actively pursued, thanks largely to his Republican predecessor, Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Californians quickly learned that Jerry Brown 2.0 had changed his mind about public works – even lamenting publicly about the state’s inability to think and act big.
He enthusiastically promoted the bullet train and saw ground broken for an initial stretch of track in the San Joaquin Valley. And he pushed hard for the tunnels as a solution to the bottleneck in the Delta.
Brown will soon leave the governor’s office for a second time, and neither of the two big projects he’s adopted as his own is certain to continue.
The twin tunnels, dubbed California WaterFix, seem to have the better chance, thanks to recent financial commitments by Southern California’s Metropolitan Water District and other agencies – even the San Diego County Water Authority, which had been a very sharp critic.
Brown played a key role in those approvals, personally beseeching Southern California officials to do what they had seemed somewhat reluctant to do.
However, the project still faces a gauntlet of environmental approvals and potential lawsuits, and it’s unclear whether Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a San Franciscan and the leading candidate to succeed Brown, would continue to back the tunnels. Northern Californians tend to see WaterFix as a water grab by the south.
The bullet train is markedly shakier, since the High-Speed Rail Authority has yet to come up with financing for extending the San Joaquin Valley stretch to San Jose and, according to a new USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll, just 31 percent of the state’s voters now want the project to continue.
Brown certainly hopes both will become reality, but it’s just as likely that both will go onto his gubernatorial scorecard as incompletes.
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters