Republish
Once again, most ‘job killer’ bills rejected
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Once again, most ‘job killer’ bills rejected
Share this:
The just-ended biennial session of the California Legislature was arguably the most liberal in California.
Driven by their party’s anti-Donald Trump fervor, the Legislature’s majority Democrats drafted and passed hundreds of bills, many of them openly aimed at setting California apart from what Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress have been doing.
The legislative session’s overall left-of-center tone, however, had a curious exception.
The California Chamber of Commerce did even better than usual in sidetracking the liberal measures that it placed on its notorious “job killer” list.
Over the last two decades, ever since the annual list was first published, the chamber and allied business groups have rung up about a 90 percent kill ratio. But in 2018, the organization was even more successful, killing or watering down all but one of the 29 bills that it targeted, including one added in the dying hours of the session. Most vanished without leaving the political DNA of rollcall votes.
The one survivor had a familiar author, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, a San Diego Democrat who has a remarkable record of getting her “job killer” bills, most of which deal with labor union or employment issues, through the Legislature.
Her victory this year was a biggie. Assembly Bill 3080 bars employers from imposing arbitration agreements as a condition of hiring employees.
It was framed as a way of protecting women from sexual harassment on the job by making it easier for them to sue and is a major piece of an anti-harassment package that legislators passed after they were embarrassed by harassment allegations against fellow lawmakers and legislative staffers.
The chamber argued in vain that the bill would just benefit personal injury attorneys, would delay settlements of employment disputes and may be set aside by the courts as an infringement on federal arbitration law.
The last-minute addition to the job-killer list was Assembly Bill 893 by Assemblyman Eduardo Garcia, a Coachella Democrat, which would have required the state’s utilities to acquire more geothermal electric power, thus boosting a project sponsored by the Imperial Irrigation District.
It wasn’t the first time the Imperial district has pushed such a bill, and this one lasted just three days before being quietly killed in the Senate Rules Committee.
Unlike AB 893, most “job killer” bills are, like Gonzalez Fletcher’s successful measure, sponsored by four major groups allied with the Democratic majority – labor unions, trial attorneys, environmental groups and consumer protection advocates.
They tend to be major agenda items for those groups, which makes their demise even more remarkable.
Among the failures was a Senate-passed universal health care plan, which was blocked in the Assembly by Speaker Anthony Rendon, who cited its lack of a financing mechanism.
Rendon was chastised by the uber-liberal wing of his party, which considers universal health care its highest policy priority.
Ultimately, the Legislature created a blue-ribbon commission to study the issue for three years, which will remove immediate pressure on Rendon and other leaders, such as Governor-in-waiting Gavin Newsom, to act.
A major contributing factor to the stall on health care, as well as several other bills on the list, was the palpable reluctance of many Democratic legislators to pass any more new taxes.
That reluctance stemmed from the June recall of a Democratic state senator, Josh Newman, who had voted for a package of gas taxes and other fees for transportation projects. A November ballot measure, Proposition 6, would repeal the taxes.
Ironically, the transportation taxes are strongly supported by the California Chamber of Commerce.
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters