Republish
Congressional seats could hinge on voter turnout
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Congressional seats could hinge on voter turnout
Share this:
There’s not a lot of uncertainty, at least in the macro sense, about the outcomes of next week’s election in California.
It’s fairly certain that Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom will be elevated into the governorship and that U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein will win re-election.
It’s also highly likely, verging on certainty, that the two highest-profile statewide ballot measures, one to repeal a new package of gas taxes and automotive fees enacted last year (Proposition 6) and another to repeal decades-old restrictions on local rent-control laws (Proposition 10), will be rejected.
The biggest question that the election will answer is whether a blue wave of disdain for President Donald Trump will flip as many as a half-dozen Republican-held congressional seats and help Democrats recapture control of the House of Representatives.
Parties and interest groups are funneling many millions of dollars into the targeted districts, mostly in Orange County and other Southern California suburbs. And in the final days of the campaign, they are concentrating on “get out the vote” efforts, even though having a month-long period of voting by mail has greatly changed those dynamics.
Whether Republicans suffer minimal congressional damage—perhaps two seats—or Democrats gain several more will hinge largely on how many registered voters actually cast votes and who they are.
Historically, voter turnout is relatively low in what are called “off-year” elections, meaning there’s no presidential contest. Four years ago, in fact, turnout hit a record low of just 42 percent of California’s registered voters, only to climb to 75 percent two years later during the sensational duel between Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton.
It was that election that initially sparked Democratic hopes of flipping Republican congressional districts, since Clinton won in seven of those districts, and Trump’s low approval ratings since have added more fuel.
Just 39 percent of this year’s likely state voters approve of Trump’s performance in a new poll by the Public Policy Institute of California, which also found that 55 percent of them would prefer to vote for a Democratic congressional candidate.
Although low-turnout elections generically favor Republicans, this year’s lack of seriously contested top-of-the-ticket races for governor or U.S. senator could, GOP leaders worried aloud, depress turnout among their relatively small number of registered voters.
A low GOP turnout, combined with Democrats’ anti-Trump fervor, would damage Republican prospects in targeted congressional districts. Therefore, the party helped place Proposition 6 on the ballot, hoping that the chance to vote against the state’s new gas taxes would spark Republican enthusiasm.
It’s certain that turnout will be higher than 2014’s record low 42 percent but will not approach the 75 percent level of a presidential year. So 50 percent, more or less, of California’s 19 million registered voters is a reasonable guesstimate.
However, there’s no reason to believe that Republican voting will be extraordinarily high, as GOP leaders hope. PPIC’s polling this year found that 47 percent of likely voters are Democrats and 28 percent are Republicans, both a few points higher than their parties’ registrations, while 21 percent are “no party preference” independents, somewhat less than NPP registration.
PPIC also found that strong majorities of likely voters are white, women, middle-aged or older, college-educated, above-average in income and homeowners, as well as Democratic in their political leanings, even if they are NPP registrants.
With the electoral deck stacked against them, it will be a minor miracle if Republicans avoid a congressional debacle in California this year.
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters