Republish
California must finally end the backlog of unprocessed rape kits. Here’s how
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California must finally end the backlog of unprocessed rape kits. Here’s how
Share this:
By Connie Leyva and Nancy E. O’Malley, Special to CalMatters
Sen. Connie M. Leyva is a Democrat from Chino, representing Senate District 20. Senator.Leyva@senate.ca.gov. Nancy E. O’Malley is the District Attorney for Alameda County, info@alcoda.org. They wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
After a sexual assault, survivors undergo an incredibly invasive procedure, typically involving being examined, swabbed and photographed for several hours. The specific purpose is to collect DNA and other evidence used to identify the perpetrator.
It is the ultimate injustice to discover that thousands of sexual assault evidence kits collected during the examination sit untested and ignored on the shelves of a police department or crime lab.
That is why we have introduced and are sponsoring Senate Bill 22. We want to ensure justice for survivors of sexual assault and we want to apprehend the assailants.
Following federal best practices, SB 22 requires that newly collected rape kits be submitted within 20 days and tested no later than 120 days after receipt. This timeline ensures that never again will a survivor find her or his kit sits untested.
Three years ago, we worked on legislation to eliminate the statute of limitations on rape and sexual assault, which was signed into law here in California. The fight for justice for survivors of sexual assault now continues with SB 22.
The Alameda County District Attorney’s Office embarked on the task of identifying all untested rape kits in 2013, and discovered a county-wide backlog of nearly 1,900 kits. Today there are no untested sexual assault evidence kits in Alameda County, though that is certainly not the case in other counties across the state.
We have been fighting for statewide regulations to ensure that all kits are tested in a timely manner. Without such a requirement, DNA evidence sits untested, survivors are denied justice and perpetrators continue to roam our streets undetected.
Across California, sexual assault survivors are clearly not receiving equal access to justice. SB 22 would ensure that sexual assault survivors in the state of California will have access to the swift submission and analysis of forensic evidence associated with their cases.
Promptly testing DNA evidence in sexual assault kits will prevent backlogs of forensic evidence in laboratories or evidence rooms and can identify an unknown assailant, link crimes together, identify serial perpetrators, and exonerate the wrongly convicted.
In this #MeToo and #TimesUp era that has given long overdue visibility and urgency to issues surrounding sexual assault, it is clear that public discourse is forcing long-needed conversations about holding perpetrators of these crimes accountable for their actions.
Through SB 22, we have worked alongside the Joyful Heart Foundation and Natasha’s Justice Project to correct this intolerable injustice. As SB 22 nears Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk, we appreciate the bipartisan support that this vital measure has earned throughout the legislative process.
In a state with a $213 billion budget, the cost of processing these kits will be minor, especially when compared with the potential justice for survivors of sexual assault.
—
Sen. Connie M. Leyva is a Democrat from Chino, representing Senate District 20. Senator.Leyva@senate.ca.gov. Nancy E. O’Malley is the District Attorney for Alameda County, info@alcoda.org. They wrote this commentary for CalMatters.