Republish
What Newsom got right and what Trump got wrong about vaping
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
What Newsom got right and what Trump got wrong about vaping
Share this:
By Adam Gray, Special to CalMatters
Assemblyman Adam Gray is a Democrat from Merced, representing Assembly District 21, assemblymember.gray@assembly.ca.gov. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters. To read his previous commentaries for CalMatters, please click here, and here.
When Gov. Gavin Newsom announced his executive order on vaping on Monday, he got right what President Trump got wrong.
The governor’s executive order targets both nicotine and marijuana enforcement and gives his agencies until October to develop specific recommendations on how the state should best respond to these issues.
Jeremy Samuel Faust, an emergency medicine physician and instructor at Harvard Medical School, wrote of President Trump’s proposal: “Banning flavored e-cigarettes as a way of combating the outbreak of vaping-associated lung illnesses is like banning all cheeseburgers because of an E. coli outbreak on two lettuce farms. It’s the wrong solution to the wrong problem. It makes us feel like we are doing something, but it won’t actually help.”
It took a doctor to cut through media reports which have erroneously identified the flavors in e-cigarettes as the cause of more than 500 reported vaping related lung illnesses. This is not to discount the role flavors have played in the teen vaping epidemic. But it is not sound science to conflate the two issues.
As chair of the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee, I’ve met with representatives from the California Department of Public Health who explained that all but one of the vaping-related lung illnesses reported in California is attributable to marijuana vape pens purchased on the black market.
While that sounds like good news for California’s legal marijuana marketplace, early reports have attributed vitamin E acetate as the problem ingredient. Surprisingly, that is not prohibited from being used in the manufacture of legal marijuana vape pens.
Even if another ingredient emerges as the key issue, there are no guarantees legal marijuana vapes won’t contain that ingredient as well.
The governor’s directive has put words into action, and the Legislature has a bill in place to turn those actions into law.
Assembly Bill 1639—which I authored with Assembly members Jordan Cunningham, Republican from San Luis Obispo, Robert Rivas, Democrat from Hollister, and Sydney Kamlager-Dove, Los Angeles Democrat—contains many of the provisions needed to properly regulate e-cigarette marketing.
However, the bill does not yet go far enough to address the other important issues facing the state and the vaping technology industry.
Given how little we know about vapes and their link to the lung illnesses being reported across the country, it may be time to impose a moratorium on the technology as a whole, regardless of what drug it is being used to deliver.
If we are unwilling to put a moratorium in place, then we must radically alter our current approach to regulating vaping technology.
The wild west of e-cigarette marketing and advertising must come to an end.
During the next three months when the Legislature is not meeting, I intend to hold an informational hearing to better understand the current regulatory environment.
My colleagues and I will seek to identify where existing efforts have failed, and discuss recommendations made by the California Department of Public Health and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration consistent with Gov. Newsom’s executive order.
We will use what we learn to expand the provisions of the AB 1639 and, with support from fellow legislators, have the bill ready to send to the governor in January.
Until we know more, users of vapes and e-cigarettes should take the advice issued by the Centers for Disease Control and refrain from using these products further.
—
Assemblyman Adam Gray is a Democrat from Merced, representing Assembly District 21, assemblymember.gray@assembly.ca.gov. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters. To read his previous commentaries for CalMatters, please click here, and here.