Republish
School suspensions don’t work. California is right to restrict them
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
School suspensions don’t work. California is right to restrict them
Share this:
By Christina Kim, Special to CalMatters
Christina Kim is a Title III instructional coach for a school in East Los Angeles that is part of the Los Angeles Unified School Districts, cskim1105@g.ucla.edu. She wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
I once had a student who needed intensive behavioral support. Some people at my school felt this student should be suspended because of his erratic behavior. The reality was different.
Acting out was his way of saying, “I need help.”
What people did not know was that this student had gone through extensive trauma. He has witnessed his father get arrested and his mother taken away by Border Patrol agents. His behavior at school was a result of him hurting and not understanding how to process his emotions.
Instead of pushing him out of school, we advocated to get him the resources he needed, inside and outside of school. Counselors worked with him multiple times a week focusing on strategies to help him cope with his emotions.
Past legislation ended the practice of suspending kindergartners through 3rd-graders for what is called “willful defiance” and disruption. But in 2017-2018, about 20,000 students in grades 4 through 8 were suspended on these grounds.
Now, Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed into law legislation by Sen. Nancy Skinner, Berkeley Democrat, to end suspensions for “willful defiance” for 4th through 8th-graders. This new law represents a big moment for California.
I am a teacher-leader for Educators for Excellence-Los Angeles, a teacher-led organization. We strongly supported this legislation. We know that suspensions for willful defiance and disruption are too often used to push students, particularly students of color, out of school.
Ending willful defiance suspensions is a racial justice and educational equity issue. Young men of color are disproportionately suspended for the same behavior as their white peers.
A recent study revealed that students lost over 150,000 days of school due to defiance or disruption suspensions in 2016-2017. This new legislation will keep more students in school, encouraging school leaders and educators to use more effective alternatives, and to understand and address the root cause of misbehavior, such as restorative justice and socio-emotional learning practices.
In 2013, a group of student, parent, and community leaders led a successful campaign to end willful defiance suspensions in Los Angeles. Since then, the L.A. Unified School District has reduced suspensions from 26,569 to 6,423. But even the best policies have to be implemented well.
That’s why it’s on all of us—teachers, parents, and administrators—to insist that alternatives to school suspension are properly executed and fully funded.
In 2014, Educators for Excellence-Los Angeles did our part by releasing “The Equity Movement,” a teacher-written policy paper that outlined ways to reduce racial discipline disparities across L.A. Unified. We continue to meet to make sure restorative justice practices are implemented across the district by next year.
Most recently, a cohort of teacher leaders released a policy paper, which discusses ways L.A. Unified and our teachers’ union can invest in restorative justice and socio-emotional learning practices.
From my experience with working with students, like the student mentioned earlier, I learned that identifying and addressing the root cause of behaviors is essential to helping students begin the process to heal and feel supported at schools.
Suspension does not change behaviors or solve anything. Schools should have the necessary resources to plan and provide support for students, not push them out.
Alternative practices such as restorative justice allowed me to build relationships with students and hear their stories. My hope is that school districts across the state will now invest in giving teachers more effective, research-based tools to help students. We must ensure that thoughtful alternatives are well-funded across the state and train students, teachers, and administrators to use them.
____
Christina Kim is a Title III instructional coach for a school in East Los Angeles that is part of the Los Angeles Unified School Districts, cskim1105@g.ucla.edu. She wrote this commentary for CalMatters.