Republish
Californians are free-spirited by nature. So why does the Legislature want them all to work for corporations?
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Californians are free-spirited by nature. So why does the Legislature want them all to work for corporations?
Share this:
By Vince Fong, Special to Calmatters
Assemblyman Vince Fong is a Republican who represents the 34th Assembly District in Kern County, Vince@vincefong.com. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
California has a history of cutting-edge innovation and creativity. We produce new technology, movies, music, food, and energy.
But unfortunately, the California Legislature is pushing policies that will stifle the entrepreneurial spirit that California is known for.
Assembly Bill 5, signed into law last year by Gov. Gavin Newsom, imposes a one-size-fits-all approach for many California freelancers and independent contractors.
This law, which took effect on Jan. 1, imposes new rules dictating who can legally work as an independent contractor, or freelancer, and who must be an employee.
It is Sacramento’s latest attempt to micromanage the economy based on Democrats’ misguided belief that the government should make career decisions instead of individuals. Unfortunately, this law is threatening the livelihood of freelancers across California.
Recently, I was contacted by a dear constituent of mine, Diana, who lost her work as a translator.
The company for which she was providing translation services ended Diana’s contract as a result of AB 5. Hiring traditional employees is unworkable for translation companies because their workload fluctuates depending on demand and clients’ needs.
For freelancers like Diana, having the flexibility to provide their services as an independent contractor is a critical part of how they can manage and build their lifestyle. A working mom or dad may need flexibility to balance work and personal life to do what is best for their family.
How many of us have gotten a ride via Uber or Lyft, gotten a meal delivered via your smart phone, gone to a salon, or read a sports blog on our favorite team?
All these workers are independent contractors. Health care workers, truckers, independent teachers and so many more professions face tremendous uncertainty. Companies are opting to protect themselves and avoid hiring Californians.
In December, Vox Media announced it would cut ties with California-based independent contractors for their SB Nation sports publication. The company is consolidating work performed by hundreds of freelance writers into just a handful of full and part-time employees.
Vox Media’s decision is one example of why the estimated 1.5 million independent contractors in California spent the holiday season worrying whether they can earn enough as freelancers to support themselves.
We are seeing this play out in negative ways for many people including immigrants working as interpreters, teachers who want to teach online or as a side gig, and students needing to make some extra cash from an app-based job with flexible schedules. The impact on our economy is widespread and will have real world impacts.
Californians are free spirited by nature. They want flexibility to support themselves and their families as they see fit. So why do the Democrats in the Legislature want them all to work for corporations?
____
Assemblyman Vince Fong is a Republican who represents the 34th Assembly District in Kern County, Vince@vincefong.com. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.