Republish
LA County’s ‘corridor of corruption’
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
LA County’s ‘corridor of corruption’
Share this:
Southeastern Los Angeles County is a jumble of small cities containing mostly poor and/or immigrant residents who have been clobbered by the COVID-19 pandemic and the deep recession it induced.
However, the region is also “a corridor of corruption” in the words of Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, who represents a piece of it.
In this century alone, more than a dozen officials in cities such as Bell, Cudahy, South Gate and Lynwood have been convicted of corruption, but the syndrome continues.
Poverty, low voter involvement and a lack of civic organizations make them ripe targets for takeovers by corrupt political figures who help themselves to lavish salaries and expense accounts and hand out fat contracts to their pals.
Tom Hogen-Esch, a professor at California State University, Northridge, wrote about the region’s endemic corruption after a spectacular scandal in Bell, exposed by the Los Angeles Times.
“It would be a mistake to dismiss the Bell scandal as merely another spectacle of government corruption in southeast Los Angeles,” Hogen-Esc wrote. “Above all, abuses in Bell and other California cities should be viewed as symptoms of a larger failure of political systems to incorporate new immigrants.”
“Failure to recognize the problem and change the underlying conditions that lead to municipal corruption risks a further erosion of civic engagement and democratic legitimacy in high immigration cities,” he continued.
One of the many agencies to fall prey is the Central Basin Municipal Water District, which provides water to about 1.5 million residents in 24 cities and unincorporated communities.
Journalists, civic watchdog groups and governmental auditors have cataloged the agency’s managerial shortcomings and conflicts of interests.
In 2015, for instance, state Auditor Elaine Howle delved into Central Basin and found a list of questionable and/or illegal practices, including a secret “legal trust fund” of nearly $3 million, contracts awarded and extended without bidding, giveaways of money for obscure purposes, and shoddy hiring practices.
A year before, Central Basin had figured in a federal corruption case against members of the Calderon family, long a powerful political presence in the region.
State Sen. Ron Calderon pleaded guilty to mail fraud and his brother, former Assemblyman Tom Calderon pleaded guilty to money-laundering.
After Tom Calderon left the Assembly, he started a political consulting business and one of his first clients was Central Basin, which paid him nearly $1 million over 10 years to provide “valuable insight and guidance.”
Finally, however, something is being done about Central Basin — an attempt to abolish it.
Senate Bill 625, carried by Sen. Steven Bradford, an Inglewood Democrat, which is near enactment, would wipe out the district and transfer its duties to another agency, the Water Replenishment District of Southern California.
“The Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) is in disarray,” Bradford argues, citing a power struggle among directors that has essentially stopped operations and its refusal to comply with open government laws.
Central Basin certainly deserves a death sentence, but the larger issue of endemic corruption in southeastern LA County remains unresolved.
While federal authorities have occasionally swooped in with indictments, such as the Calderon case, local prosecutors and the state attorney general, Xavier Becerra, have shown little interest in attacking the region’s corrupt culture.
Two years ago, replying to a direct question about the region’s corruption, Becerra replied, “We defer to the locals. I don’t have the resources to do what the locals should be doing.”
That’s pathetic.
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters