Republish
More seats on river conservancy board could turn the tide on access
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

More seats on river conservancy board could turn the tide on access
Share this:
By Destiny Rodriguez
Destiny Rodriguez is the regional community relations manager of The Climate Center, destiny@theclimatecenter.org.
Andrew Escamilla, Special to CalMatters
Andrew Escamilla is the Central Valley regional organizer for the California League of Conservation Voters, andrew@ecovote.org.
It may be hard to imagine, but many families in Fresno and Madera counties never get to enjoy the pleasures of the San Joaquin River, the beautiful waterway in our own backyards in an area starved for green space.
According to the Trust for Public Land, Fresno ranks 97th among the top 100 most-populated cities in the country for public green space access, acreage, investments, amenities and equity. The picture is especially grim for residents in neighborhoods of color, who have “access to 8% less park space per person than the city median and 44% less than those in white neighborhoods.”
For these communities in Fresno and Madera counties, the San Joaquin River Parkway has the potential to provide a rare connection to nature and its public health benefits, including lower stress, better mental health and opportunities for social interaction. But the stark reality is that, despite the fact that it is public space, access to the river has historically been limited, due in part, to the San Joaquin River Conservancy Board.
Assembly Bill 559, authored by Assemblymember Dr. Joaquin Arambula, would change that, by expanding the board to include a more diverse and equitable array of voices in conservancy decisions.
The board currently has 15 seats, and only two are dedicated to residents of Fresno and Madera counties. Of those, one seat is filled from a list of private landowners along the river; the other is selected by a local environmental organization. AB 559 would allow the governor to appoint two more board seats — one from local tribal organizations and the other from the public at large. It also would remove the requirement that one county resident must be a property owner, and would require the Fresno and Madera boards of supervisors to develop their lists of candidates from a list submitted by local nonprofit organizations that support outdoor recreation, conservation, environmental justice or social justice issues.
The current board’s makeup is out of touch with the interests of the communities it serves and does not align with their needs. The conservancy was established to provide public green space to local communities, yet the board chooses to limit access to the river.
In 2019, for example, it considered plans to provide three public access points to the Lewis Eaton Trail, which would have expanded community access to the river. But due to disagreements about the access point locations, the board failed to pass the proposal, delaying plans that had been in the works for years. To this day, river access points are still located primarily on private property.
The pandemic has not only emphasized the need for all residents to have access to green space, it has clearly revealed the severe lack of access for many of our disadvantaged communities.
We call on the California Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee and the state Senate to pass AB 559 and its supporting funding, and on Gov. Gavin Newsom to sign it. With this support, we can bring equitable representation to the conservancy board.
Everyone has a right to enjoy nature. AB 559 offers the perfect opportunity for the state to amend the board selection process to reflect the region’s diversity, to invest in the Central Valley’s families and to make access to nature more equitable for everyone.