Republish
Housing justice relies on a strong CEQA
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Housing justice relies on a strong CEQA
Share this:
By Ashley Werner, Special to CalMatters
Ashley Werner is a directing attorney at Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability.
For generations, public agencies have directed highways, landfills, meat processing plants, warehouses and other polluting facilities to South Fresno neighborhoods, an area of the San Joaquin Valley that is predominantly populated by lower income households and people of color.
This activity has turned South Fresno into one of the most environmentally burdened neighborhoods in the state. Every day, thousands of trucks rumble past homes and schools. Domestic wells have run dry as warehouse landscaping springs up around them.
2020’s devastating hardships brought important truths about the enduring legacy of structural racism and inequity in California to the forefront of public awareness. Some recognized for the first time that many communities suffer from a lack of access to clean air, reliable drinking water, quality housing, safe parks and other basic amenities due to this legacy.
It does not need to be this way.
The California Environmental Quality Act, known as CEQA, is a powerful tool that shifts a legacy of environmental and social injustice and holds elected officials accountable for the health and safety of communities. Environmental justice advocates and grassroots leaders have relied on CEQA to protect public health for 50 years, and CEQA has become our state’s premier civil rights and environmental justice law.
Under CEQA, agencies must respond to public comments, study the environmental and health impacts of development, and reduce impacts to the greatest extent possible. If agencies fail to meet these requirements, communities can leverage the courts to secure protections they are rightfully owed.
Unfortunately, we continue to see decision-making practices that shut residents out of decisions that shape their communities, including in the debate over California’s affordable housing crisis. To truly solve this crisis, we must prioritize the needs of communities impacted by discriminatory housing and land use policies. This would ensure the solutions we advance help people rather than put them further at risk.
That is what CEQA can do and is already doing, despite how developers have mischaracterized the law as a cause of California’s affordable housing crisis. Less than 1% of projects subject to environmental review have led to litigation. Decisions by local governments play a much more significant role in limiting the housing development needed by our communities than CEQA ever has. Targeting CEQA only obscures true solutions to the housing crisis, like the need for deep investments in affordable housing, housing preservation strategies and legal protections for tenants.
South Fresno residents have often used CEQA to protect their rights. The city approved a sprawling warehouse project in 2017 without meaningful environmental review and without public input. The project would have brought more than 2 million truck and car trips into the neighborhood each year, with no meaningful mitigation to reduce vulnerable populations’ exposure to hazardous air pollution.
When the city and the developer failed to respond to residents’ concerns, residents leveraged CEQA to stop the project. Earlier this year, this same community used CEQA to negotiate a settlement to mitigate the impacts of an Amazon warehouse expansion in the community. This time, the developer will complete the project, but they and the city have agreed to significant commitments to reduce impacts on local residents.
These commitments include extending sewer and water connections into the unincorporated community; making safety upgrades for pedestrians and bicyclists; and establishing a community benefits fund to provide home improvements, like dual-paned windows and air filtration, to reduce pollution exposure.
We know too well how environmental injustice impacts Californians. We must not continue to repeat the mistakes of the past. To achieve fair outcomes for all residents, we must create inclusive processes, not suppress public engagement.
In California, at this critical moment of opportunity to move beyond our legacy of environmental injustice and to achieve housing justice for all, it is incumbent on us – agencies, the public and developers – to give all residents a chance at dignity and security. Doing that means keeping CEQA strong.