Republish
California’s poor face new dilemma: inflation
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California’s poor face new dilemma: inflation
Share this:
California’s economy was booming before COVID-19 clobbered the state two years ago, with record low unemployment and soaring personal income.
Even so, California had the nation’s highest rate of poverty as calculated by the Census Bureau, with about 15% of its nearly 40 million residents impoverished, largely due to the state’s ultra-high cost of living, particularly for housing.
The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), using similar methodology, concluded that prior to the pandemic “nearly one in six (16.4%) Californians were not in poverty but lived fairly close to the poverty line. … All told, more than a third (34%) of state residents were poor or near poor in 2019.”
There’s no question that the massive shutdown in much of the state’s economy, ordered by Gov. Gavin Newsom to battle the pandemic, made things worse for the millions of Californians already feeling economic distress.
While most workers in upper-income brackets could adjust by continuing to work from home, Californians in low-wage service sectors such as hotels and restaurants saw their jobs disappear.
Unemployment insurance and other safety net programs partially offset income losses, but the net impact on the working poor was still negative, exacerbating the state’s poverty dilemma, and those temporary supports are expiring as the nation’s overall economy has largely recovered.
California’s recovery from the COVID-19 recession, however, has been sluggish. It has regained fewer than three-quarters of the two-plus million jobs it lost, 1.2 million workers are still unemployed, and its unemployment rate of 6.5% is well above the national rate of 3.9%.
As grim as those numbers are, the economic distress in California’s low-income households is being worsened by another phenomenon: inflation.
A new study by PPIC reveals that the impacts of rising living costs are hitting those families the hardest.
Overall, living costs in California and the four other Pacific Rim states are up 8.2% in the last two years, driven by especially sharp jumps in the costs of food, energy and automobile fuel, PPIC calculated.
“In 2019, low income families (in the bottom fifth) spent 83% of their budget, or $26,500, on essentials like food, shelter, clothing, transportation, and health care,” PPIC calculated. “Top income families (in the top fifth) spent substantially more on these items, about $82,000, but this constituted are much smaller share of their total spending (64%).”
“We estimate that the lowest income families have experienced an overall price increase of 9.6% since December 2019, while the highest income families have seen something more like an 8.2% increase,” PPIC says.
“In dollar terms, to purchase the same things they bought in 2019, the lowest fifth of families would need to spend an additional $3,000.”
PPIC’s report added that “for those who haven’t seen at least an 8% rise in income since 2019 (and higher for lower income residents), real purchasing power has fallen behind. Moreover, for those who are unemployed or working in low-wage sectors, price increases at this level worsen existing challenges to meeting basic needs.”
Inflation, obviously, is not confined to California and it’s emerging as a sleeper issue in this year’s elections as Republicans, seeking to regain control of Congress, are attempting to blame Democrats.
Politics aside, it’s a very real problem for those in lower-income strata who were already struggling to survive an uncertain job market. The state’s efforts to soften its impact, such as Newsom’s proposal to defer a gas tax increase, are paltry at best.
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters