Republish
California should embrace telework for state employees
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer āBy Author Name, CalMatters.ā If youāre republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use āBy Author Name, Special for CalMatters.ā
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the storyās text, include this copy: āThis story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: āThis commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If youāre republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, āyesterdayā can be changed to ālast week,ā and āAlameda Countyā to āAlameda County, Californiaā or āhere.ā
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: āAdditional reporting by [Your Publication]ā and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as āfor CalMattersā may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If youād like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if youāre interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? Weād love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California should embrace telework for state employees
Share this:
By Cameron Knudson, Special to CalMatters
Cameron Knudson is president of Professional Engineers in California Government, representing 14,000 state engineers, architects, geologists, and related professionals.
Two years ago, COVID-19 prodded the state of California to launch a massive telework program, the most significant operational change to public service since the adoption of desktop computers. It has been a rousing success.
Now we have arrived at a critical juncture as departments formalize remote-work policies for the post-pandemic world: Will we fully embrace flexible telework as COVID worries ease, or slide back toward an outdated, inefficient, butts-in-seats business model that poorly serves Californians, state employers and state employees?
Early indications, unfortunately, suggest the latter. Departments are ordering employees back to the office by April 1 for two, three and four days a week without identifying any operational need for the mandate.
As president of Professional Engineers in California Government, I can tell you many of the 14,000 state engineers, architects, geologists and related professionals we represent donāt understand these recent return-to-the-office edicts. Sadly, two years of employee resilience, innovation and success are giving way to an old paradigm that dismissed state telework for 30 years.
For many reasons, the state must maintain a robust and flexible policy, starting with the Newsom administrationās 2021 directive for 75% of state employees to telework. Since then, data show 16 departments tracked by the state are hitting the mark. About 72% of employees eligible for remote work do so full-time, 22% telework part-time and just 6% of employees who could work remotely do not.
The stateās experience reflects what studies show: Teleworking employees are as productive or even more productive than commuting staff. When commuting is a quick walk down the hall, employees are generally more relaxed, happier, more efficient and take less sick time.
The governor wisely seized the moment, telling departments that telework was here to stay and should be the first option for state employees, not the last.
āThe administration wants to continue to reap teleworkās benefits for the employees and for the state,ā Newsomās government operations secretary said last year, āby making sure we encourage as much telework as possible while still meeting our mission to serve Californians.ā
Since then, telework has saved taxpayers a projected $22.5 million in relinquished office leases, according to government data, and the savings will nearly quadruple to $85 million annually in coming years. Telework also reduces the stateās carbon footprint, benefiting the environment.
Many of our members value the convenience, savings and work-life balance telework provides. They appreciate the stateās accommodations, from state-issued laptops and teleconferencing technology to stipends that help offset home-office expenses. They avoid jammed commutes while burning $6-per-gallon gas. But, above all else, our members have appreciated the implicit trust that they can stay home and still serve Californians.
But as employers roll out post-pandemic work policies, new state rules replace the flexibility, consistency and good faith with random dictates arbitrarily applied to be in the office a certain number of days without identifying how that serves operational needs or the public. In essence, work-from-home opportunities are becoming a matter of individual departmentsā or managersā predilections, not what is necessarily best for California.
This could well bump up against the Professional Engineers in California Governmentās labor agreement with the state, which says, in part, āno employeeās request for telecommuting shall be unreasonably denied.ā
There is still time for the state to get it right. Extending two years of cooperation and success should not devolve into a costly labor-management dispute over the unnecessary denial of telework options that serve no department objective or mission.
Professional Engineers in California Government urges decision-makers at all levels of state government to stay true to the administrationās stated objectives ā provide telework opportunities to as many employees as possible to reduce carbon emissions and congestion, save money by downsizing office space, and improve productivity and service to the public.
After all, the administrationās remote-work goals, the facts and the last two years support a vigorous statewide telework program that trusts public servants to perform. So do Professional Engineers in California Government.