A San Mateo city council meeting at City Hall in San Mateo on Dec. 12, 2022. Photo by Jane Tyska/Bay Area News Group
In summary
A lawsuit was filed to try and stop a law aiming to curb pay-to-play influence in local government. One of the plaintiffs, a suburban Sacramento representative, argues that the law could make it harder for diverse candidates to be competitive, and further enable dark money from special interests.
Guest Commentary written by
Garrett Gatewood
Garrett Gatewood is a member of the Rancho Cordova City Council.
When I became the first Black person elected to the Rancho Cordova City Council in 2018, I wasn’t the scion of a powerful political family or the beneficiary of wealthy special interests. I made history because of my track record fighting for my community, and was able to mobilize a lot of fellow citizens who shared my passion and were willing to invest in my campaign.
Senate Bill 1439, authored by Sen. Steve Glazer, would make that impossible for future candidates facing the same challenges, and make it harder for political newcomers and members of minority groups to get elected.
The policy is described as a tool to “ban pay-to-play,” which is a good soundbite, but such unethical activity has been and remains illegal. Rather than improving ethical campaign activity and good government policy, in practice, SB 1439 is a well-intentioned disaster that will disproportionately hurt minorities trying to win a seat at the table.
Learn more about legislators mentioned in this story
Sen. Steve Glazer has taken at least
$78,350
from the Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
sector since he was elected to the legislature. That represents
17%
of his total campaign contributions.
I understand the challenges that underrepresented communities must overcome to compete for public office. Let’s be honest, politics favors the rich and powerful, not people who look like me. SB 1439 will make it even harder.
Proponents of the bill claim it decreases the influence of money in politics by drastically reducing how much candidates can receive from donors who have an interest in the future of their communities. But in truth, it forces campaign money underground and empowers wealthy candidates and special interests.
I certainly would rather know who is really funding the candidates running in my community.
Politics today is toxic enough – we should not surrender control of public debate to unaccountable special interests who will flood our mailboxes and airwaves with negative hit pieces. Meanwhile, this law would limit new and minority candidates’ access to the funds needed to share their vision and their words with their constituents.
SB 1439 takes power from local elected officials – and the voters who elected them – by prohibiting officials from voting for 12 months after a contribution of just $250 is made. That would stall efforts to build roads, revitalize schools, create affordable housing or tackle homelessness.
California faces a host of crises from education and infrastructure, to crime, homelessness and housing. This law doesn’t solve any of them. And, it will make it harder for us to elect more diverse, representative candidates who are ready to fight for real solutions.
California pay-to-play law could empower wealthy candidates and special interests
Share this:
In summary
A lawsuit was filed to try and stop a law aiming to curb pay-to-play influence in local government. One of the plaintiffs, a suburban Sacramento representative, argues that the law could make it harder for diverse candidates to be competitive, and further enable dark money from special interests.
Guest Commentary written by
Garrett Gatewood
Garrett Gatewood is a member of the Rancho Cordova City Council.
When I became the first Black person elected to the Rancho Cordova City Council in 2018, I wasn’t the scion of a powerful political family or the beneficiary of wealthy special interests. I made history because of my track record fighting for my community, and was able to mobilize a lot of fellow citizens who shared my passion and were willing to invest in my campaign.
Senate Bill 1439, authored by Sen. Steve Glazer, would make that impossible for future candidates facing the same challenges, and make it harder for political newcomers and members of minority groups to get elected.
The law took effect this year. I joined a lawsuit to try and stop it.
The policy is described as a tool to “ban pay-to-play,” which is a good soundbite, but such unethical activity has been and remains illegal. Rather than improving ethical campaign activity and good government policy, in practice, SB 1439 is a well-intentioned disaster that will disproportionately hurt minorities trying to win a seat at the table.
Learn more about legislators mentioned in this story
Steve Glazer
State Senate, District 7 (Orinda)
Steve Glazer
State Senate, District 7 (Orinda)
Time in office
2015—present
Background
Mayor / University Trustee
Contact
Email Legislator
Voter Registration
Sen. Steve Glazer has taken at least $78,350 from the Finance, Insurance & Real Estate sector since he was elected to the legislature. That represents 17% of his total campaign contributions.
I understand the challenges that underrepresented communities must overcome to compete for public office. Let’s be honest, politics favors the rich and powerful, not people who look like me. SB 1439 will make it even harder.
Proponents of the bill claim it decreases the influence of money in politics by drastically reducing how much candidates can receive from donors who have an interest in the future of their communities. But in truth, it forces campaign money underground and empowers wealthy candidates and special interests.
History has shown that restrictions on publicly-disclosed contributions to candidates actually increase how much money is spent on campaigns. Even worse, it hides that spending from public and media scrutiny by shifting it into dark-money PACs and independent expenditure campaigns funded by special interests with no spending limits and little motivation to tell the truth.
I certainly would rather know who is really funding the candidates running in my community.
Politics today is toxic enough – we should not surrender control of public debate to unaccountable special interests who will flood our mailboxes and airwaves with negative hit pieces. Meanwhile, this law would limit new and minority candidates’ access to the funds needed to share their vision and their words with their constituents.
SB 1439 takes power from local elected officials – and the voters who elected them – by prohibiting officials from voting for 12 months after a contribution of just $250 is made. That would stall efforts to build roads, revitalize schools, create affordable housing or tackle homelessness.
California faces a host of crises from education and infrastructure, to crime, homelessness and housing. This law doesn’t solve any of them. And, it will make it harder for us to elect more diverse, representative candidates who are ready to fight for real solutions.
We want to hear from you
Want to submit a guest commentary or reaction to an article we wrote? You can find our submission guidelines here. Please contact CalMatters with any commentary questions: commentary@calmatters.org