Republish
How the Israel-Hamas war is dividing California’s Democrats and academics
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
How the Israel-Hamas war is dividing California’s Democrats and academics
Share this:
The deadly war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, a militant Palestinian faction, has revealed deep social and political fissures in America and California is not immune.
Although polls generally indicate that Americans support Israel’s incursion into Gaza after Hamas conducted a deadly attack in Israel on Oct. 7 – mirroring the Biden administration’s policy – the issue is more nuanced in California.
A recent Public Policy Institute of California poll found that 61% of California adults and 51% of voters say the U.S. should not take a side, but there’s a stark partisan division. Democrats are much more likely to favor neutrality with just 19% taking Israel’s side and 16% supporting Palestine. However, 59% of Republicans back Israel and just 4% Palestine.
The Democratic fragmentation was displayed when pro-Palestine demonstrators disrupted a recent state Democratic Party convention in Sacramento.
Similarly, when President Joe Biden attended a series of high-dollar campaign fundraising events in Southern California over the weekend, pro-Palestine demonstrators rallied outside the glitzy events, which were largely sponsored by prominent Jewish entertainment industry figures such as Steven Spielberg, Barbra Streisand and Rob Reiner.
On Monday, the California Legislature’s Jewish caucus issued a statement thanking Biden for “standing with Israel and with the Jewish community during this incredibly challenging moment…”
Simultaneously, however, Politico reported that some Democratic legislative staffers are circulating a letter urging legislative leaders and Gov. Gavin Newsom to support an immediate ceasefire and an international tribunal to investigate and prosecute war crimes in Gaza and Israel.
The internal Capitol effort emerged just a few days after Newsom cancelled the traditional public lighting of the Capitol’s Christmas tree, substituting a virtual ceremony and citing the potential for conflict at the event.
Newsom’s action drew sharp criticism from pro-Palestine groups. “Governor Newsom decided to cancel the tree lighting ceremony rather than face the public that is enraged by his shameful silence on the genocide in Gaza,” Yassar Dahbour of the Sacramento Regional Coalition for Palestinian Rights said in a statement.
Underlying the political angst in California and elsewhere is a rhetorical conflict over whether opposition to Israel’s crusade to destroy Hamas in the aftermath of its surprise attack is simply a policy issue or reflects latent antisemitism, particularly among those on the nation’s political left.
Leaders of several Ivy League universities hemmed and hawed last week when asked whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” would violate their codes of campus conduct and now face a backlash that could cost them their positions.
One of the more ironic aspects of the increasingly shrill debates, occurring largely within Democratic Party and left-leaning academic circles, is what’s happening in the University of California.
UC regents tackle free speech, safety concerns amid Israel-Palestine conflict
UC regents announced they will commit $7 million to combat antisemitism and Islamophobia on campuses. The money will go to training faculty and staff, and to mental health services for staff and students.
On Nov. 15, UC President Michael Drake declared that UC will launch “programs focused on better understanding anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, how to recognize and combat extremism, and a viewpoint-neutral history of the Middle East.”
Faculty members who wanted to take pro-Palestine positions in their instruction denounced Drake’s statement, saying he was violating the principle of academic freedom by trying to dictate classroom content.
Drake then issued a “clarification” in which he said he was referring to “voluntary, extracurricular educational programming on our campuses, not classroom content.”
Those who complained about having their academic freedom violated over teaching Mideast history did not object when UC officials were demanding that to be considered, applicants for faculty positions had to demonstrate, by word and deed, that they agreed with the system’s policies on “diversity, equity and inclusion.”
Defining the principle of academic freedom, it would seem, hinges on the ideology of those who believe their rights are being abridged.
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters