Republish
My friend was fatally struck by a car. These street safety changes could’ve saved her – and others
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
My friend was fatally struck by a car. These street safety changes could’ve saved her – and others
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Nicole Efron
Nicole Efron works in clean energy and is a street safety advocate based in San Francisco.
One of my dearest friends, Julia Elkin, was struck and killed by a car last month.
Julia was exceptional. She was the kind of person you wish the world was full of – a generous, hilarious, creative soul whose life’s work in climate adaptation centered around improving our lives.
Julia’s death has devastated everyone who knew her, and it was entirely preventable. As in many other traffic fatalities, the street where Julia was hit is notoriously dangerous. But to be clear, no one is safe from traffic violence, as cars and trucks get bigger and more lethal to pedestrians, as more people speed or make mistakes due to distracted driving, and because streets are almost always designed for cars to move quickly.
This makes crossing the street and driving a car the most dangerous things you’ll do today and every day.
Julia’s death was avoidable, and the next ones are, too, if the Legislature chooses conscience over convenience. California lawmakers made progress last year by passing Assembly Bill 413, which prohibited parking near crosswalks, but there is vastly more work to be done. Right now, legislators have two opportunities to get closer to ending these senseless deaths: Senate Bills 960 and 961.
SB 960 would require Caltrans to execute on its own policies to build state roads with sidewalks, crosswalks, narrower lanes and other components that make roads work for all users. Caltrans adopted a policy in 2021 to plan for so-called “complete streets” (with designated space for cars, pedestrians, bikes and safe access to mass transit), yet only about 20% of the agency’s projects meet the criteria.
SB 961 would limit how fast cars can go above the legal speed limit since speeding is the No. 1 factor that determines if a collision is fatal. This bill would also require new trucks to have side underride guards, so people don’t get pulled underneath a truck, which increases the deadliness of an accident.
The reality is that driving behavior is getting worse. Speeding and distracted driving are leading factors in traffic collisions: A car that hits a pedestrian at 35 mph is five times more likely to kill them than at 20 mph. Speeding also increased during the pandemic (speeding-related fatalities in 2021 were almost 25% higher than in 2011), and experts say the change appears to be lasting.
Adequate street safety is both a national problem and an acutely California problem – in 2021, for example, pedestrian accidents were 17% of national traffic deaths but 26% of California’s.
Often, a small number of local streets account for a high proportion of serious traffic injuries and deaths – and that’s where we must start. A single stretch of Marin Avenue, where Julia’s collision occurred, was responsible for over 20% of Berkeley traffic deaths between 2012-2022.
Streets are not designed to prioritize safety, and that needs to change. This means streets with slower speeds, shorter and more visible crosswalks, lower turning speeds, protected bike lanes and other physical changes – many of the core tenets of Caltrans’ complete streets policy.
Addressing speeding and street design ultimately requires overcoming the false divide of “drivers versus pedestrians.” As drivers, we should all be demanding changes. Anyone could fall victim to traffic violence, but we could also just as easily be the perpetrators. Oversized cars, endless distractions and deadly street design mean that just one mistake could be fatal.
Ask yourself: What would you do if you took the life of a child, a best friend, a parent?
Safe-streets bills like SB 960 and SB 961 could have saved Julia’s life. With lawmakers’ support, they can save so many others.
Read More
California new laws for 2024: Speed cameras and cruising allowed
Two state agencies ground Cruise driverless cars for public safety