Republish
Rick Caruso is considering another political run. His best shot might be California’s highest office
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer āBy Author Name, CalMatters.ā If youāre republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use āBy Author Name, Special for CalMatters.ā
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the storyās text, include this copy: āThis story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: āThis commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If youāre republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, āyesterdayā can be changed to ālast week,ā and āAlameda Countyā to āAlameda County, Californiaā or āhere.ā
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: āAdditional reporting by [Your Publication]ā and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as āfor CalMattersā may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If youād like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if youāre interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? Weād love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Rick Caruso is considering another political run. His best shot might be California’s highest office
Share this:
Rick Caruso is apparently not done yet.
The billionaire businessman spent more than $65 million for the privilege of losing the 2022 Los Angeles mayoral race to Karen Bass, but he impressed some voters and observers with his command of the issues, his debate performances and his overall approach to the campaign.Ā
He lost anyway ā and badly. After a close initial count on election night, the late returns broke Bassā way, and she ended up beating him by nearly 10 percentage points, or almost 90,000 votes.
Afterward, Caruso accepted defeat and wished Bass well. But even then, he said he wouldnāt be far.
āThere will be more to come from the movement we built,ā he said in a statement, ābut for now, as a city we need to unite around Mayor-elect Bass and give her the support she needs to tackle the many issues we face.ā
As that suggested ā and as Carusoās more recent remarks have reminded ā his defeat in the mayoral race did not quench the businessmanās desire to influence public policy or secure political office. He has spent the past two years observing and judging the work of elected officials, including the woman who beat him and the emerging field for California governor.
He gives the impression of someone on the hunt for an opening.
In recent weeks Caruso has been stepping up his critique of Bassā performance, though not criticizing her directly. Through his newsletter, heās blamed the cityās āpothole problemā on its budget shortfalls. Heās sounded the alarm about the ācrisisā in retail theft and about the use of LAPD officers to respond to graffiti.
Some of his criticisms are more oblique. Heās warned, for instance, that the cost of housing in Los Angeles threatens the cityās āvibrance and economic healthā by making it unaffordable for āyoung adults, teachers, first responders, and many others.ā Mind you, thatās coming from a developer whose beachfront Montecito property, the Rosewood Miramar Beach hotel, offers rooms ranging from $1,500 to $6,500 a night.
His compassion for struggling young people has its limits.
The most pointed criticisms focus on the cityās response to chronic homelessness, given Bassā intense focus on the problem since she took office. He has archly suggested that Bass ā again, not by name ā is not doing enough to bring people off the streets.
Read More: LA quality of life is at a record low, survey shows. Why political leaders shouldnāt ignore that
āI find it unconscionable that valuable funds are being wasted and housing units sit empty while tens of thousands of our fellow Angelenos are left out on the streets,ā he said in a message last month to supporters.
Is Caruso spoiling for a rematch with Bass? The Los Angeles Times noted that his recent missives have ā(stoked) talk about his political ambitions,ā but heās not saying what ā he declined an interview with The Times and declined an interview for this column.Ā
Still, itās enough to get people wondering.Ā
The most obvious question is whether he could win a rematch. Bass continues to poll well and is well-liked ā even by more conservative voters. That makes ousting her an uphill battle, yet some political experts I spoke with differ on whether Caruso would have a shot, in part because they have different theories about why he lost. Each leads to a different conclusion about his future prospects.
Some say, for instance, that he was doomed by his last-minute decision to register as a Democrat (he was previously registered as āNo Party Preferenceā and a Republican before that). To make the change on the eve of his campaign announcement fostered a sense of cynical opportunism.Ā
If thatās what sunk him, perhaps he would do better with four years as a member of the party. And heās been busy bolstering his profile as a Democrat, denouncing Donald Trump and hosting party fundraisers, including a December event for President Joe Biden.Ā
Others believe that even with his late conversion to the cityās dominant political party, Caruso might have had a chance in the mayorās race but for the Supreme Courtās ruling in the Dobbs case just as the campaign was heating up. That ruling, which stripped women of a federal right to an abortion, bluntly reminded voters in Los Angeles and elsewhere of the sharp difference between parties on matters of fundamental rights.
It also did not help Caruso that he had contributed to candidates who opposed abortion rights. Again, those feelings might not be as heightened if he decided to seek the mayorās office in 2026.
But there is a third analysis of Carusoās loss that is more sobering for his chances: Los Angeles is a very liberal city, and Carusoās moderate politics ā either in his previous life as a Republican or his current iteration as a Democrat ā are simply a nonsale in LA.
Consider the election and reelection of Nithya Raman to the Los Angeles City Council. Raman is an outspoken progressive and was elected in 2020 as a newcomer running in what was a historically moderate section of the city. The district includes the Hollywood Hills, Sherman Oaks and Reseda ā enclaves of wealthy homeowners and even vestiges of Republicans ā along with more traditionally liberal communities such as Silver Lake and Los Feliz.
Raman unseated an incumbent to win her race in 2020, and this year won reelection outright in March, despite a credible challenge from a moderate opponent, deputy city attorney Ethan Weaver, a candidate whom Caruso supported.Ā
Thatās a reminder that Los Angeles is getting more liberal, not less; today, fewer than 1 in 5 Angelenos is a registered Republican. Thatās not great news for a Caruso comeback.
But the mayorās office is not Carusoās only potential political entry point. There is a noticeable opening elsewhere in California government: the governorās office.
Oddly, Caruso may have a clearer path to that office. With Gov. Gavin Newsom termed out, the office is open, and the current field lacks a dominant candidate, and is crowded by liberal contenders.
If Caruso could position himself as a moderate candidate and finish in the top two in the primary, he could appeal to a broad spectrum of voters. California overall has shown little appetite for Republicans ā the hapless Steve Garvey is evidence of that ā but has far more use for them than Los Angeles does, and still remains open to moderate Democrats, which is how Caruso would run.
Though Caruso himself did not answer the question this week as to whether he might seek the governorship, a person with knowledge of his strategy confirmed that he was thinking about it.
āIt is clear that thereās a strong need for leadership,ā the source told me. āHe is clearly examining that race.ā
Thereās something strange about the idea that getting beaten in the race for mayor of Los Angeles is a step toward becoming governor of California, but itās possible. And Caruso is ready to jump.
More from Jim newton
Los Angeles politicians take rare steps to limit their power and boost public confidence ā sort of
No matter what district attorney candidates say, Los Angeles is much safer than it used to be
Jim NewtonCalMatters Contributor
Jim Newton is a veteran journalist, best-selling author and teacher. He worked at the Los Angeles Times for 25 years as a reporter, editor, bureau chief and columnist, covering government and politics.... More by Jim Newton