Republish
If California opts for smaller changes to prisons, rehabilitation must remain a priority
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
If California opts for smaller changes to prisons, rehabilitation must remain a priority
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Steve Brooks
Steve Brooks is an award-winning incarcerated journalist who resides at San Quentin and works at San Quentin News. He is the first incarcerated participant in the California Local News Fellowship.
A first-of-its-kind orientation inside the San Quentin Rehabilitation Center last month helped illuminate what California can do to keep its prison population decreasing if lawmakers approve a budget cut that would close dozens of housing blocks statewide.
The recent event, hosted by the People in Blue, a special incarcerated committee working to change the culture of California’s prison system, comes at a time when Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to close 46 housing blocks in 13 different prisons to save an estimated $80 million a year.
Almost 3,000 people waited in line to enter a gymnasium and other locations where they were able to meet with dozens of incarcerated facilitators and self-help group volunteers from outside communities. The goal was to take a more active role in pursuing rehabilitation and healing.
“This needs to happen more often for youngsters coming here,” said L.L. Romero, a correctional officer who works with The Last Mile coding program. “It would help if everyone participated to help build a bond of communication, recognition, respect and relationships. We need to make a change.”
This event promoted TPIB’s so-called Linear Rehabilitation Model proposal, which was first presented to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation last fall.
“What many people don’t realize is participating in rehabilitation while in prison is not mandatory,” said TPIB president Arthur Jackson. “Incarcerated people don’t have to participate in any particular rehabilitation programs, and don’t have a right to any particular programs.”
Read Next
Gavin Newsom moves to ‘transform’ San Quentin as California prison population shrinks
Under the group’s rehabilitation plan, incarcerated individuals would enter the prison system and meet with a team of mentors, such as a custody officer, mental health worker and peer mentor, for example. This team will meet newcomers where they are, and help them develop goals for dealing with their trauma, substance use, gang affiliation and other types of issues before they’re released.
“People in prison should participate in rehabilitation,” Jackson said. “We should have a human right to rehabilitation and healing. A visual roadmap to rehabilitative success should be created for each individual entering into the system.”
Under California’s penal code, “the purpose of incarceration is rehabilitation and safe and successful reentry back into the community.”
CDCRs core values, expressed in its strategic plan, include empowering incarcerated individuals to transform their lives and providing unique programming opportunities so that they have a solid foundation when they return to the community. This requires creating safe spaces for incarcerated individuals to learn and thrive.
Today’s political climate contrasts the 1990s when Gov. Pete Wilson enacted tough-on-crime laws that essentially converted California prisons to human warehouses. The prison population peaked in 2006, causing essential services for prisoners to almost collapse. Officers suffered PTSD from dangerous, overcrowded conditions.
The population is currently 93,000 and still to large for the state to meet the rehabilitative needs of all prisoners. California’s prison footprint must decrease to accomplish the mission.
Most California prisons don’t have the rehabilitative infrastructure that San Quentin does. But if CDCR utilizes officers as sponsors and allows incarcerated people to act as facilitators, it can give other prisons a taste of San Quentin at no additional cost to taxpayers.
While closing 46 housing blocks may not save much money in the short term, enhancing rehabilitation programming can help population numbers continue to fall and eventually lead to five more prison closures, as the Legislative Analyst’s Office recommends.
It currently costs $132,860 per year to house each incarcerated individual. This cost will continue to rise with people leaving prisons in the same condition they entered it — unless access to rehabilitative programs is improved.
Read More
California is spending more on fewer inmates. Why isn’t Newsom closing more prisons?
California jails are holding thousands fewer people, but far more are dying in them