Republish
One of California’s new ‘trailer bills’ has origins in Capitol’s long history of closed-door politics
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
One of California’s new ‘trailer bills’ has origins in Capitol’s long history of closed-door politics
Share this:
As required by law, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s budget staff this week posted initial drafts of 59 bills they say would be needed to implement the 2025-26 state budget that Newsom proposed a few weeks ago.
That’s a polite fiction.
While many of the bills do relate to the budget, others have little or no connection but are designated as “trailer bills” merely to make them easier to enact. Those should properly be studied and debated on their own, rather than be secreted in the budget package.
One proposed measure that needs explanation and examination would delay for four years a crackdown on street racing, so-called “sideshows” and other forms of extreme driving that police officials say pose a serious threat to roadway safety. The Legislature approved the tougher penalties on dangerous drivers almost unanimously in 2021, and they were to take effect this year.
If the trailer bill is enacted, the law would be delayed until 2029.
Another proposed trailer bill, while quite innocuous in its effect, has an interesting and seamy backstory. It would extend a long-standing program of providing special devices that allow deaf people to use telephones for another nine years, financed by adding a few pennies to telephone bills each month.
Read Next
California has more money than expected. Here’s how Gavin Newsom wants to spend it
Few would quarrel with a program aimed at overcoming the isolation that deaf and hard-of-hearing people may experience, but its creation nearly a half-century ago illustrates the wheeling and self-dealing that dominated the Capitol in the 1970s and 1980s.
Terry Goggin, a Democratic assemblyman from San Bernardino, carried legislation to create the program but it sounded fishy to Vic Pollard, a reporter for the San Bernardino Sun who had often written about Goggin’s many schemes.
Pollard revealed that the seemingly benign legislation benefited Goggin’s longtime friend and sometime business partner, Dennis Krieger, who was underwriting a stock sale for a company that made the only devices Goggin’s legislation would finance. After Pollard reported on that connection, Goggin was fined by the Fair Political Practices Commission.
Read More: ‘Notoriously slow:’ Lengthy investigations into California politicians leave voters in the dark
I also added a chapter to the Goggin saga. At one point in the late ’70s, during one of California’s periodic gasoline supply crises, Goggin introduced a bill to prohibit oil companies from owning service stations. I reported for the Sacramento Union that his measure exempted one company that had employed Goggin’s father and Krieger’s father as top executives.
After my story published, Goggin dropped the bill.
Pollard later revealed to me that Goggin, who lost his Assembly seat in 1984, had once told him, “Somebody is going to make money off of everything we do up here, and it might as well be our friends.”
Pollard added, “He also tried once to hire me to get me off his back.”
Goggin’s political defeat was not the end of his saga, however.
After his old friend, Willie Brown, the legendary speaker of the state Assembly in the 1980s and 1990s, became mayor of San Francisco in 1996, Goggin moved to the city and began practicing law and lobbying city government. Eight years later, after Brown’s mayoralty ended, he and Goggin teamed up to propose a multimillion-dollar lobbying campaign for the state’s bullet train project.
That gambit fell through and Goggin went into the coffee shop business, operating four concessions in Bay Area Rapid Transit stations while seeking investors to expand the chain.
That also backfired when federal prosecutors alleged that he had lied to potential investors about finances of the chain, which later went bankrupt. Then 78 years old, he pleaded guilty in 2019 to money laundering and two years later was sentenced to one year and one day behind bars.
Read More
California blesses political donors’ strategy to multiply their influence
At 90, California political icon Willie Brown still dominates every room he enters
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters