Republish
Costly health care expansion worsens California’s chronic budget deficit
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Costly health care expansion worsens California’s chronic budget deficit
Share this:
When Gov. Gavin Newsom two months ago proposed a $322 billion state budget for the 2025-26 fiscal year, he projected what was depicted as a “modest surplus” of $363 million.
Anyone who knows anything about state budgeting knows that it’s impossible to accurately pinpoint such a tiny figure, amounting to scarcely one-tenth of 1% of the overall budget. It could have been a number plucked from the air to make the budget appear balanced.
In fact, the budget’s own numbers revealed that the administration’s projected revenues would fall many billions of dollars short of covering its projected spending. The shortfall would be covered by a raft of on- and off-budget loans, dips into the state’s emergency reserves and accounting gimmicks, such as pushing the June 2026 state payroll back a month later in the 2026-27 fiscal year, thus reducing 2025-26 spending by several billion dollars.
All-in-all, the $363 million surplus cited in January is just a smaller version of the $97.5 billion surplus that Newsom bragged of having in 2022 but that turned out to be a mirage due to extremely inaccurate multi-year revenue projections. Ultimately the administration acknowledged that the state would be receiving $165 billion less over four years than it had assumed.
As the administration now concedes, the harsh reality is that the state faces multibillion-dollar gaps indefinitely — at least $10 billion a year — between income and outgo, thanks largely to the flurry of spending Newsom and Legislature embraced on the $97.5 billion surplus presumption.
One of those big spending increases — expanding Medi-Cal coverage to all 1.6 million undocumented residents — is already being felt.
Read Next
It’s costing California more than expected to provide immigrant health care. Is coverage at risk?
Expansion is costing $2.8 billion more than budgeted. When combined with other cost factors, Medi-Cal has a $3.4 billion shortfall, which will be temporarily covered with a loan from other state funds.
Meanwhile, Newsom and legislators also approved spending $2.5 billion on costs related to the Los Angeles wildfires — money that they hope will be reimbursed by President Donald Trump, with no guarantees that it will be.
Although revenues are running over 2024-25 expectations so far, this flurry of numbers suggests that when Newsom revises his 2025-26 budget in May, that “modest surplus” will morph into a substantial additional deficit — on top of the deficit that he and the Legislature papered over with $11 billion in various so-called “solutions.”
Sensing an opening, Republicans are hammering Newsom for the rising costs of providing Medi-Cal coverage to undocumented immigrants.
“Democrats and the governor are picking priorities, and they’re prioritizing people that have come into our country illegally over people who immigrated here legally, people that are citizens,” Senate Republican leader Brian Jones said.
Political zingers aside, this multi-year saga indicates that Newsom and his budget staff are not very competent when it comes to estimating both revenues and spending. That phantom $97.5 billion surplus stemmed from an assumption that a spike in revenues as the state’s economy emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic would be a permanent increase of about $40 billion a year over pre-pandemic levels.
Read More: California’s budget whiplash: From a record-setting surplus to a massive shortfall in one year
Why they made such an erroneous assumption remains a mystery. The administration blames the volatility of the state’s revenue system — particularly its lopsided dependence on very high-income taxpayers — for the error.
That long-standing factor should have made Newsom, et al, more cautious about making long-term revenue projections, but instead they threw caution to the wind in his rush to brag that “no other state in American history has ever experienced a surplus as large as this.”
It’s a boast that will continue to plague California’s fiscal planning long after Newsom has ceded the governorship to someone else.
Read More
Bipartisanship is rare in the California Legislature. Here are the bills breaking the divide
California uses gimmicks instead of addressing the heart of its budget problem
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters