Republish
Achieving the ‘abundance agenda’ in California will require more than just efficiency
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer āBy Author Name, CalMatters.ā If youāre republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use āBy Author Name, Special for CalMatters.ā
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the storyās text, include this copy: āThis story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: āThis commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If youāre republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, āyesterdayā can be changed to ālast week,ā and āAlameda Countyā to āAlameda County, Californiaā or āhere.ā
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: āAdditional reporting by [Your Publication]ā and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as āfor CalMattersā may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If youād like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if youāre interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? Weād love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Achieving the ‘abundance agenda’ in California will require more than just efficiency
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Amy Lerman
Amy E. Lerman is a political science and public policy professor at UC Berkeley and executive director of the UC Berkeley Possibility Lab.
Lindsay Maple
Lindsay Maple is the director of projects and planning and leads the “Abundance Accelerator” at UC Berkeleyās Possibility Lab.
California has a scarcity problem.
In recent decades, theĀ cost of consumer goodsĀ like cars and cell phones has fallen, while the cost of healthy food and childcare has climbed. Weāre rich in natural resources, land and people, but when it comes to producing more of the things we need like housing, energy and transportation infrastructure, weāre drastically falling short.
In aĀ 2024 University of California survey, the Possibility Lab found that more than half of the stateās voters agree that it is difficult to access at least some essential goods and services.Ā
Across the country,Ā a growing conversationĀ is taking shape around how we can build more of what people need to live full, thriving lives. Itās called the āabundanceĀ agenda,ā and it argues that the administrative burdens placed on constructing and producing the things we need more of are simply too high.
Californiaās leaders should embrace theĀ abundanceĀ framework to solve our scarcity problem. But achieving this vision requires more than just focusing on efficiency ā it requires investing in people.
We canāt achieveĀ abundanceĀ without the architects, developers, planners and construction workers building our infrastructure. Beyond building, we canāt bring aboutĀ abundanceĀ without the home care workers, pre-K teachers and primary care physicians who sustain our eldercare, childcare and health care systems. If we truly want to realizeĀ abundance, we need policies that make these jobs attractive and achievable: offering better wages, improving working conditions and building career pathways that recognize their vital contributions to a thriving society.Ā
TheĀ abundanceĀ movement often implicitly ā or explicitly ā calls outĀ people as part of the problem.Ā Proponents criticize the participation of environmental and labor groups as slowing down progress. If we want to navigate the difficult trade-offs between whatās fast and whatās fair, though, weĀ need new models for engaging. The current systems, where public input often takes the form of prolonged review processes that empower NIMBY, or not-in-my-backyard obstructionism, isĀ not productive.
At the same time, simply overriding community concerns in the name of speed is neither equitable nor politically viable.
Read Next
āToo damn hard to buildā:Ā A key California Democratās push for speedier construction
Instead, we need mechanisms for inclusive decision-making that foster consensus rather than gridlock. This could mean designing participatory planning processes that bring diverse stakeholders to the table earlier and at the level of city-wide or regional planning, setting clear timelines for input, and usingĀ deliberative and digital toolsĀ to enhance transparency and engagement.
It could also mean developing targeted policies to ensure that new development balances benefits to both future and existing residents, such as affordable housing requirements paired withĀ labor or community benefits agreementsĀ that link growth to local priorities.
For all of its promise, theĀ abundanceĀ movement risks remaining an intellectual exercise unless it embraces a clear, testable set of strategies. UC Berkeleyās Possibility Lab launched anĀ “AbundanceĀ Accelerator”Ā over a year ago to exploreĀ 12 key issue areasĀ whereĀ abundanceĀ policy can make a real impact. The lab is also working withĀ state and local agenciesĀ andĀ community organizationsĀ to design and test new models for community engagement to help reach shared policy goals.Ā
The transition from conversation to action starts with the people who will implementĀ abundance. Policymakers and practitioners need to prioritize not only regulatory reform but also educational opportunities and workforce pipelines that ensure we have the trained population necessary to deliverĀ abundance.
Philanthropy and impact investors need to focus on funding models that support not just innovation but the human infrastructure required to scale it. And state and local governments must work with communities to establish decision-making processes that move past obstructionist politics and toward meaningful solutions.Ā
AbundanceĀ is ultimately about human flourishing. That requires reimagining not just how we build, but who builds and who benefits, ensuring that those individuals are supported, trained and empowered.
If we want a future of trueĀ abundance, we must start by investing in the people who will make it possible.
Read More
Will this bill be the end of Californiaās housing vs environment wars?
This foundation tries to get young Californians into transportation jobs