Republish
Pharmacy benefit managers find savings in California drug costs. Don’t tie their hands
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Pharmacy benefit managers find savings in California drug costs. Don’t tie their hands
Share this:
Pharmacy benefit managers play a pivotal role in negotiating the prices for prescription drugs, but many officials believe their tactics warrant reform. Below, a pharmacist says California lawmakers should proceed with caution as they consider new restrictions. The opposing view: A community pharmacy owner argues these middlemen need to be reined in.
Guest Commentary written by
Christina Patel
Christina Patel is the lead pharmacist at CVS Specialty in San Francisco.
As a lead pharmacist in San Francisco, I see firsthand how the cost of medications can be as overwhelming as the diseases they’re supposed to treat.
Every day, my team of pharmacists and technicians helps patients navigate complex conditions such as cancer, autoimmune disorders and multiple sclerosis. A cancer diagnosis is difficult enough; but for many patients, the challenge is compounded by the soaring price of their oncology medications, which can cost thousands of dollars a month.
While pharmacy teams can often provide some relief by connecting patients with financial assistance programs, so-called pharmacy benefit managers work to bring down prescription costs by negotiating directly with drug manufacturers.
READ NEXT
Newsom’s got an idea even Trump likes—will it lower California’s drug prices?
Earlier this year, California enacted new transparency requirements across the prescription drug supply chain, including enhanced reporting standards for benefit managers, also known as PBMs.
Before fully understanding the effect of these changes, California is now considering new legislation that would limit pharmacy benefit managers’ ability to negotiate lower drug prices. Senate Bill 41 would eliminate one of the most effective tools pharmacy benefit managers have for controlling prescription costs, potentially devastating patients, who rely on the savings pharmacy benefit managers help secure and which employers and unions pass on.
Rather than rushing to adopt additional restrictions, California lawmakers should take time to accurately assess the impact of this year’s transparency reforms. They should realize that effective cost controls require all parties of the health care system to work together.
Over my career, I’ve watched countless patients rely on their pharmacists for help. Many patients have serious concerns about their prescriptions, including potential side effects. Patients deserve to focus on their health, not on whether they can afford their medication. California’s legislators must proceed carefully. If done improperly, additional pharmacy benefit restrictions could prevent patients from accessing the life-saving medications they need.
READ NEXT
Gavin Newsom says these middlemen drive up drug prices. He’s got a new plan to fix it
These middlemen say they keep drug prices low. California lawmakers don’t buy it