Republish
California law silences abuse victims in court. Why won’t the Legislature change this?
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California law silences abuse victims in court. Why won’t the Legislature change this?
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Susan Bustamante
Susan Bustamante is a member of the California Coalition for Women Prisoners.
Thirty years ago, I did the bravest thing I could imagine: I asked for help.
I had survived years of childhood sexual abuse by my father, followed by a violently abusive marriage. For years my husband beat me, threatened me, forced me into isolation and even forced me to have an abortion.
I endured it and stayed quiet until I couldn’t anymore. I had two daughters to protect.
When I confided in my brother and explained what was happening, I believed I was taking a first step toward freedom. I never expected my husband would be killed and that I would be charged with his death, accused of plotting to collect a life insurance payout.
I believed the truth would protect me, that if the courts knew about the years of abuse, they would understand. However, at trial I was barred from discussing the years of trauma, fear and violence. Antiquated laws meant my truth was silenced.
I was sentenced to life without parole.
This was not justice, but I am not alone. A Stanford University survey of women incarcerated in California for murder or manslaughter found nearly 75% had experienced intimate partner violence the year before their offense.
California law allows courts to ignore that context — even when a person’s actions were the direct result of agony, coercion or desperation. Survivors often are punished without being able to tell their full story.
Assembly Bill 938, which died in the legislative “suspense file” last week, would have given survivors a chance to present evidence of abuse and trauma. This testimony isn’t just a defense; it’s a crucial part of the truth. It ensures that what came before a moment of crisis is not erased.
We’ve seen some progress in recent years. More survivors of human trafficking are getting a chance to clear their criminal records, which often resulted from their exploitation. That has made a difference: It has brought families together and reopened doors to jobs, housing and healing.
READ NEXT
Are California police missing domestic violence murders? New bill would let families review cases
But many other survivors of trafficking, domestic violence, and child abuse are still denied relief because current law is too narrow. Their suffering is pushed aside. Their records follow them for life.
Unfortunately, they’ll have to keep waiting.
Abusers and traffickers often force their victims to commit crimes. They use illegal acts as tools of control and threats of exposure as a leash. This results in survivors facing lengthy prison sentences while the abuse they endured is left out of the courtroom entirely.
AB 938 would’ve allowed judges to hear about the years of psychological manipulation and impossible choices survivors have to make. It didn’t create loopholes; it created fairness. It didn’t excuse harm; it acknowledged harm that was already done.
When survivors are believed and supported, they can do more than just survive. They heal. They raise families. They rebuild their communities. But that only happens when the justice system sees them as whole people with whole stories.
Though I was sentenced to die in prison, I was granted commutation in 2017. I came home to a world that had moved on without me. I’d missed my daughters’ weddings and my grandchildren’s births — moments I’ll never get back.
Yet I carried on and reconnected with my family. I’m building a life with the time I have left. I don’t need pity. I needed a court that listened.
This commentary was updated to reflect the bill’s progress. It was shelved in the “suspense file” on Friday.
READ NEXT
New bill would let judges weigh survivors’ history in human trafficking cases
How a well-intended California domestic violence law results in victims being arrested