Republish
California Legislature leaves Bay Area transit bailout in limbo
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California Legislature leaves Bay Area transit bailout in limbo
Share this:
Politicians tend to be procrastinators, putting off major policy issues until they can no longer be ignored without political fallout.
Accordingly, the last few days of any legislative session tend to be maelstroms of marathon meetings, loud debates and backroom dealmaking.
As the California Legislature ended its session last week one of its odder scenarios had to do with an on-again, off-again $750 million loan to financially strapped public transit systems and companion legislation that would authorize San Francisco Bay Area bus and rail systems to seek voter approval for a regional sales tax hike.
In a sense, Gov. Gavin Newsom is responsible for the systems’ financial pickle because five years ago, as the COVID-19 pandemic struck, he issued far-reaching orders to close businesses, or at least have their employees work from home, to reduce exposure to the deadly disease. Transit systems immediately saw sharp declines in patronage and farebox revenues.
They received some federal relief funds, but those bailouts eventually ended and ridership continued to lag behind pre-pandemic levels. As the squeeze tightened, Bay Area civic and political leaders began pressing for state permission to place a transit tax increase on the 2026 ballot. They also sought an immediate state bailout to maintain service.
The state budget approved by legislators and Newsom in June contained authorization for a $750 million loan, even though the budget had a multi-billion-dollar deficit. The $750 million figure emerged after an initial proposal for a $2 billion state bailout to split between systems in Northern California and Southern California failed to gain political traction.
The loan was to be finalized by additional legislation setting forth terms, including repayment and interest, if any. But over the next two-plus months, culminating in the Legislature’s adjournment last week, the people involved never agreed on the details.
Who did or didn’t do what remains something of a mystery. Newsom’s administration and Bay Area legislators have been blaming each other for the failure to complete the deal.
Eventually, just before adjournment, Newsom said he would “offer short-term financial assistance to support Bay Area transit agencies with hundreds of millions of dollars,” but he didn’t give an exact number.
READ NEXT
California transit systems’ pleas for aid haven’t moved the Capitol
“Transit is a lifeline to millions of Californians — and after billions in state investment, we’re continuing to back Bay Area agencies with ongoing support tailored to their needs,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’ll keep partnering with them now and into the next year — aligning flexible financing tools to their timelines — so we can deliver a sustainable, rider-first transit system together.”
Meanwhile, the legislation authorizing a 2026 transit tax election in five counties, Senate Bill 63, was passed. But the story doesn’t end there.
As now structured, the transit sales tax — a half-cent in four counties and a full cent in San Francisco — would require voter approval by a two-thirds majority. But advocates may seek to place the tax hike on the ballot via initiative petition, which would then require only simple-majority passage.
Underlying the maneuvering about Bay Area transit support is state officials’ assumption that transit will play a major role in the state’s crusade to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2045. To perform that role, transit operators would need very large, ongoing injections of taxpayer funds, a new study indicates.
The California Policy Center, a conservative think tank, examined the finances of California’s 85 transit systems, using data from the Federal Transit Administration. It found that overall, the systems collected $897 million in fares in 2023, scarcely 10% of their $8.76 billion in operating expenses. Costs were rising faster than income — and that doesn’t include capital expenditures.
READ NEXT
Bay Area transit systems want more money. But their payrolls soared as ridership declined
How gentrification is killing the bus: California’s rising rents are pushing out commuters
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters