Republish
The gap between CARE Court’s intent and its real-world application
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
The gap between CARE Court’s intent and its real-world application
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Tom Scott
Tom Scott is executive director of the California State Association of Public
Administrators, Public Guardians and Public Conservators
Re: How Gavin Newsom’s CARE Court lost its teeth in the California Legislature
The recent CalMatters article on how California’s CARE Court evolved in the Legislature
provides in-depth coverage of the challenges counties face implementing constrained policy.
The California Association of Public Administrators, Public Guardians, and Public Conservators
(CA PA|PG|PC) represents county officials who serve individuals with the most serious mental
illness, often when no family or support system is available. Our members see the gap between
CARE Court’s intent and real-world application.
Narrow diagnostic criteria, difficulty locating people experiencing unsheltered homelessness,
and assumptions about outcomes all present obstacles.
CARE Court is funded and can produce positive results in some cases. But failing CARE Court should not be treated as an automatic path to LPS conservatorship: the burden of proof remains high, and many people may not succeed in CARE Court for reasons unrelated to their ability to survive safely.
Legislation must be judged by how it functions in practice for Californians statewide.
READ NEXT
Why Newsom’s CARE Court has struggled to help homeless Californians most in need