Republish
California’s tribal casinos trample smaller cardrooms with new regulations
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California’s tribal casinos trample smaller cardrooms with new regulations
Share this:
While writing a book about California politics a quarter-century ago, I devoted one chapter largely to the phenomenal emergence of Native American tribes as a powerful interest group after being treated shamefully, even viciously, for nearly 500 years.
After their first contact with Spanish explorer Juan Cabrillo in San Diego Bay in 1542, tribal members were regarded as sub-humans by California’s early settlers. The abuse continued after California became a state in 1850.
As California historian Kevin Starr wrote, “The Indian was not kept in formal slavery, but he was exterminated at the wish and the expense of the Legislature, and for years in the southern part of the state, under the guise of penal labor, Indians were hawked from the auction-block.”
Pushed onto reservations by the federal government, most of California’s tribes lived in squalor until late in the 20th century, their plight completely ignored by governors and legislators.
That changed in 1987 after a Supreme Court decision declared that tribes had the legal right to offer gaming.
The tribes bootstrapped that original Supreme Court decision from bingo parlors in Quonset huts into 76 casinos spread across the state, some sumptuous resorts rivaling those in Las Vegas. They did it by stretching the ruling’s parameters to embrace highly profitable slot machines and eventually achieving full legal status via voter approved ballot measures.
Having claimed a legal monopoly on gambling in the nation’s most populous state, the tribes guard it closely, using political clout gained from lavish contributions to political campaign treasuries. Along the way, a feud developed, pitting casino-owning tribes against local poker parlors over what kind of games the cardrooms could offer.
The cardrooms had expanded from poker games to blackjack and other games, and the tribes contended those games violate their voter-approved monopoly. Tribes’ efforts to block the cardrooms via lawsuit failed, so in 2022, they folded into their sports wagering ballot measure a legal right to sue cardrooms if the state attorney general failed to clamp down on the allegedly illegal games.
READ NEXT
Feud between Native American casinos and California card rooms moves to Legislature
That measure, and a competing sports wagering proposal sponsored by online gaming outfits, were both rejected by voters, so the tribes turned to the Legislature, sponsoring a bill to create the same right the ballot measure sought. The cardrooms, of course, opposed the measure, but the Legislature passed it in 2024 and Gov. Gavin Newsom signed it.
The bill’s passage opened the door for Attorney General Rob Bonta to propose new regulations that would, among other things, essentially ban blackjack and similar games in cardrooms. Last month, two years after they were originally proposed, Bonta’s rules cleared a final legal hurdle and will take effect in April.
It’s a huge, even existential, blow to the cardrooms and the small cities that depend on cardroom taxes to finance their budgets. This week they struck back with two lawsuits challenging the legality of the new regulations.
“Attorney General Bonta’s regulations threaten to eliminate more than half of California’s cardroom jobs and wipe out a critical source of revenue for dozens of cities,” Kyle Kirkland, president of the California Gaming Association, said in a statement. “These games have operated legally for decades under multiple attorneys general, yet one public official is now moving to shut them down without identifying a single public safety concern or addressing the 1,764 public comments about these regulations.”
It’s a David vs. Goliath battle. An economic analysis published by Bonta’s office in conjunction with the regulations says that Indian casinos had $12.1 billion in gambling revenues in 2023, while cardrooms had just $1.4 billion.
It’s ironic that California’s tribes, treated so shabbily for so many decades, are now bullying a much smaller rival, just because they can.
READ NEXT
Judge shuts down California tribes’ latest bid to crush their casino rivals
California’s tribes once again get lawmakers to attack a gambling competitor
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters