Republish
Corporations in California were enriched by slavery. They should tell the truth
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Corporations in California were enriched by slavery. They should tell the truth
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Mona Tawatao
Mona Tawatao is the legal director of the Equal Justice Society, a member of the Alliance for Reparations, Reconciliations and Truth.
In 2024, the California Legislature unanimously passed Assembly Bill 3089 to acknowledge and formally apologize for the role the state played in perpetuating and profiting from the enslavement of Black people.
As part of that historic law, the Legislature declared that “California industries benefited from ill-gotten gains based on chattel slavery” and recognized the importance of examining those gains to ensure that the evil of commodifying human beings for corporate profit never happens again.
Now the Legislature is considering the Truth in Disclosure Act (AB 2599). Introduced by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan and co-sponsored by the Alliance for Reparations, Reconciliation & Truth, the bill would compel major corporations doing business in California to examine their own history of “ill-gotten gains” so the state can compile and publicly disclose the true story of how corporations profited from slavery.
The reality is these ill-gotten profits were foundational in building corporate wealth.
Many of today’s corporations — including those in the textile, railroad, shipping, agriculture, prison, insurance and financial industries — are tied to profits gained from enslaved labor. The legacy of slavery continues to shape California’s and the nation’s social and economic structures and deeply influences patterns of health, economic, educational and social inequities that persist, impacting the lives of millions of Black Californians.
California is no stranger to enacting transparency measures, and AB 2599 would build on a legal framework already on the books. Existing law going back decades requires similar kinds of disclosure. This includes the Slavery Era Insurance Policies Law of 2000, which generated public reports that revealed major companies operating today — or their predecessor companies — treated human beings as cargo or goods, to be insured as property.
California also passed the 2010 California Transparency in Supply Chains Act in response to public demand that major retailers and manufacturers doing business in California do what’s right and moral and disclose the truth about modern day slavery and human trafficking in their supply chains, to serve the state’s goal to eradicate these crimes against humanity.
As these and existing state disclosure laws in other areas — like climate protection and fair labor — show, California has long been a leader on corporate disclosure and accountability. Clearly California has both the ability and the imperative to pass AB 2599.
READ NEXT
Gavin Newsom embraced reparations at first. Now he’s slow rolling them
The bill follows the findings and recommendations of the California Reparations Task Force Report and the United Nations principles, which hold that reparation is incomplete without acknowledgement and public disclosure. The truth and disclosure that the bill requires carries the weight of the UN resolution, overwhelmingly passed in March, that designated trafficking and racialized chattel enslavement of Africans as “ the gravest crime against humanity.”
The Truth in Disclosure Act is not about punishment for the past. Viewing accountability for slavery as punishment runs counter to the maxim that people are not property. It runs counter to the state’s goal that enslavement be eradicated, never again to return.
As the unanimously passed apology law demonstrates, these are non-partisan, fundamental, moral principles. In fact, AB 2599 presents an opportunity for corporations to demonstrate humanity and to embrace a basic moral standard.
By requiring corporations to tell the truth, we can begin to acknowledge the enslaved people who companies or their predecessors commodified for commercial gain — people who in their lifetimes never saw the justice and repair they deserved.
When corporations disclose whose enslavement and forced labor they benefited from, the public can finally reckon with the cost. This kind of truth-telling is not just about the past — it is about preventing continued harm and ensuring future generations inherit a state rooted in true equality.
READ NEXT
California to launch ‘historic’ reparations office as advocates regroup from 5 Newsom vetoes
What to know about California reparations: Is the state’s apology the beginning or the end?