Republish
Another televised debate, another missed chance to clear up California’s unsettled governor’s race
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Another televised debate, another missed chance to clear up California’s unsettled governor’s race
Share this:
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
That old question pretty much sums up what was billed as a 90-minute debate among the eight serious — at least in their own minds — candidates for governor Tuesday night.
It really wasn’t a debate in the classic sense, but rather brief responses from the six Democrats and two Republicans to questions posed by a panel of moderators at Pomona College and broadcast by CBS stations.
They weren’t even given chances to tell the on-site audience and TV viewers, even briefly, why they wanted the job via opening or closing statements. Instead, the panelists raised a familiar array of hot button issues — gas prices, wildfires, home insurance, homelessness, health care, housing shortages and education lapses — and asked for reactions.
The Democrats generally blamed the shortcomings on greedy corporations — oil companies and insurers particularly — and Donald Trump, and the Republicans blamed Gov. Gavin Newsom and a Legislature controlled by Democrats.
Only rarely did the candidates ignore the panel’s tight controls and confront each other, but those exchanges were banal at best.
If voters tuned in to learn something about how the would-be governors would actually govern, they were given thin gruel at best. The candidates occasionally sneaked in references to what they had done prior to running for governor, but they said little about what they would do as governor, and then only when the panelists specifically sought that information.
No one stood out. But, in fairness, the tightly controlled format provided no opportunity to do so; therefore, it’s unlikely that the event will have any serious impact on what the polls have been telling us in the aftermath of Eric Swalwell’s sudden departure amidst allegations of sexual harassment and assault.
Swalwell, who also resigned from Congress, had been in the top tier of Democrats, and it had been shaping up as a duel with billionaire Tom Steyer for one of the top two primary election finishes and thus a spot on the November general election ballot.
After Swalwell’s spectacular fall, one of the Democrats mired in single-digits, former Attorney General and Biden cabinet member Xavier Becerra jumped from 4% to 13% in a Democratic Party poll, tying with Steyer. Ever since, Steyer has devoted some of his lavish advertising expenditures to attacking Becerra’s record as Biden’s health and welfare secretary.
READ NEXT
First TV debate in race for governor mostly bypassed California’s serious issues
California voters will receive their primary election ballots in a few days and will return them via mail over the following four weeks, with a June 2 deadline. At the moment, it appears that Steyer and Becerra will be competing for a runoff spot, with former Congressmember Katie Porter and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan as backup contenders should either of the two leaders falter.
Meanwhile, the two Republicans, Riverside Sheriff Chad Bianco and former television commentator Steve Hilton, could still conceivably, if not likely, finish 1-2 and freeze out Democrats in one of the nation’s bluest states.
It’s more likely that one of the Republicans will face one of the Democrats, but which Republican and which Democrat is still very uncertain as the campaigns enter their sprint to the June finish line.
Steyer will certainly ramp up his attacks on Becerra, who has drawn new support since the Swalwell departure but may not have the millions of dollars to respond in kind, especially since public employee unions, the deepest well of Democratic campaign money, are divided.
Porter also doesn’t have the resources to mount a heavy drive in the final weeks. Mahan does have money from Silicon Valley interests, but his late entry and very slow organizational efforts could doom a late push.
A pre-debate poll by CBS affirmed that there are no obvious frontrunners. The uncertainty and confusion that have marked the election of a new governor continue. Tuesday’s event didn’t provide much clarity.
READ NEXT
Billionaire blitz: Steyer’s $132 million campaign dwarfs rivals in California governor race
Here’s who benefits from Swalwell’s downfall and the shakeup of the California governor race
Dan WaltersOpinion Columnist
Dan Walters is one of most decorated and widely syndicated columnists in California history, authoring a column four times a week that offers his view and analysis of the state’s political, economic,... More by Dan Walters