Republish
California is making progress on fire prevention. Federal retreat, shaky funding put it at risk
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer āBy Author Name, CalMatters.ā If youāre republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use āBy Author Name, Special for CalMatters.ā
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the storyās text, include this copy: āThis story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: āThis commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If youāre republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, āyesterdayā can be changed to ālast week,ā and āAlameda Countyā to āAlameda County, Californiaā or āhere.ā
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: āAdditional reporting by [Your Publication]ā and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as āfor CalMattersā may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If youād like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if youāre interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? Weād love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California is making progress on fire prevention. Federal retreat, shaky funding put it at risk
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Bradley Franklin
Bradley Franklin is a research fellow at the PPIC Water Policy Center. He is an agricultural and environmental economist who focuses on ways to inform the design and implementation of public policy in natural resource management.
Kyle Greenspan
Kyle Greenspan is a research associate with the PPIC Water Policy Center, where he focuses on topics ranging from groundwater to carbon sequestration.
The Altadena and Palisades fires that swept through Southern California last year were just the latest in an escalating series of wildfires that have scorched the state.
The damage has been far-reaching: Californians have lost homes, community and ā in some tragic cases ā their lives. Wildfires are also raising insurance premiums and threatening the stateās giant sequoias and the headwater regions that provide most of Californiaās water supply.
This year threatens to be another above-average fire season. As weāve seen in recent years, fires can emerge quickly ā even after wet winters. And if it feels like wildfires are increasing in size and scale, thatās because they are: The area of land burned in severe wildfires in the Sierra Nevada has tripled since 1990, while annual wildfire damages have more than quadrupled during that same period.
Californians are understandably weary of this cycle. Decades of fire suppression have allowed vegetation to build up, increasing the risk of damages from high-severity wildfires. And now, a changing climate is intensifying the conditions that drive severe wildfire.
The good news is that the state is engaged in an unprecedented multi-agency effort to reduce severe wildfire hazard on 1 million acres of wildlands each year. Itās an ambitious target, guided by a state-led task force, and one that meets the scale of the problem.
In a new report, the Public Policy Institute of California analyzed data from the task force thatās coordinating and tracking these efforts. We found the progress toward the goal accelerated between 2021 through 2024, with an average of 591,000 acres undergoing work to reduce wildfire hazard each year.
The task forceās recently released five-year action plan doubles down on the need to prioritize the most at-risk landscapes with a call to ātreat the worst first.ā Our analysis shows that theyāre doing just that: 83% of the forest and wildland areas treated ā through thinning, prescribed burns or other methods ā were in areas with high severe wildfire potential, in areas where communities and wildlands overlap, or both.
READ NEXT
Seven years after California’s deadliest fire, schools ā and kids ā are still recovering
One of the task forceās biggest wins was how itās helped accelerate the return of beneficial fire to Californiaās landscapes. For millennia, Native peoples used low-intensity fire to manage the landscape. Beneficial fire nearly doubled from 2021 to 2024, rising from about 100,000 to 200,000 acres per year.
This increase in cultural and prescribed burns represents an economical and environmentally sound way to restore forests and woodlands to health.
However, we are in a moment when federal agencies are reconsidering commitments to reduce wildfire hazard. Shifting federal policies and cuts at the Forest Service and its federal partners ā which manage more than half of Californiaās forests ā are introducing uncertainty about Californiaās ability to limit severe wildfire.
In addition, the stateās annual budget for wildfire mitigation work could drop by hundreds of millions as key funding sources dry up. State officials recently voted to change a program that charges polluters for their emissions, resulting in $200 million less for wildfire mitigation each year.
Without dedicated funding, this crucially important work ā which touches on public health, housing, water supply and more ā will not occur at the scale the state needs.
In our report, we identified ways the task force can further enhance its efforts to protect landscapes and communities. For instance, it should refine its tracking of how long these treatments last and build the capacity of small and under-resourced partners to both conduct and report wildfire reduction efforts on private lands, which may not be captured right now.
Most importantly, this effort relies on a robust state and federal partnership that is already yielding results. Preserving this collaboration must be a priority.
Risks are rising, but the task force is making real progress. Now is not the time to lose momentum.
READ NEXT
Should coastal commission get more power over rebuilding after wildfire? Some lawmakers say yes
Sparse snowpack in California fuels concern over fast-approaching fire season