Republish
Democrats have lost Silicon Valley. Here’s what it will take to win it back
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Democrats have lost Silicon Valley. Here’s what it will take to win it back
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Dave Vorland
Dave Vorland leads the Blue Horizon Project at Chamber of Progress. He has served in the Obama and Biden administrations and worked in space and missile defense policy.
Democrats have long been the party of innovation.
John F. Kennedy promised the moon. Bill Clinton and Al Gore embraced the internet revolution. Barack Obama saw technology as a force that could improve lives and modernize government.
When HealthCare.gov failed, Obama didn’t declare war on technologists. He brought them in to fix it.
That relationship between Democrats and Silicon Valley reflected a shared worldview: optimism about the future, belief in progress and confidence that innovation could expand prosperity and solve problems.
After the 2016 presidential election, much of the Democratic Party establishment stopped seeing the tech sector as a strategic American advantage and started treating it as a political enemy. What began as a backlash against Facebook over its role in Hillary Clinton’s loss metastasized into a broader hostility toward the entire industry, including founders, venture capital, startups, crypto, artificial intelligence and even the idea of technological disruption.
Silicon Valley noticed.
You can see it now in the growing number of founders and investors who no longer feel politically at home in the Democratic Party. Many simply concluded that Democrats still wanted tech money but no longer respected tech expertise, ambition or success.
The tech industry didn’t suddenly become conservative. Democrats stopped sounding like the party of innovation.
During the Obama years, the relationship looked very different. The White House actively recruited technologists into government. Obama met regularly with tech leaders. His administration launched the U.S. Digital Service, modernized federal technology systems and treated Silicon Valley as a partner in American competitiveness.
READ NEXT
The data center backlash is here — and Big Tech is spending big to combat it
By contrast, the Biden administration often approached the tech sector with suspicion. Meetings with industry leaders became politically fraught or often never took place. Government officials worried more about activist criticism than about understanding the technologies reshaping the economy.
Democrats increasingly adopted a style of politics that many in Silicon Valley experienced as reflexively anti-innovation. Venture capital became suspect. Crypto became a moral scandal instead of something to regulate responsibly.
AI conversations often started from fear rather than opportunity. Antitrust became less about consumer harm and more about punishing size.
America is entering the most important technological transformation since the internet. AI, robotics, defense tech, energy innovation and biotech will shape economic and geopolitical power for decades.
Yet Democrats increasingly position themselves as the coalition most uncomfortable with technological disruption. The irony is that Democratic voters remain pro-technology. Americans love the products Silicon Valley builds and use them every day.
They want innovation to improve healthcare, transportation, education and government services. Their concerns about Big Tech don’t translate into broad anti-tech sentiment.
But many Democratic elites fell into what I call the “techlash trap,” blaming technology companies for political failures while abandoning the optimism that once made Democrats the party of the future.
Politically it has been a disaster. Democrats alienated founders, investors, engineers and many younger voters. Anti-tech populism didn’t align with what ordinary voters were demanding.
The most successful parts of the Biden administration actually pointed in the opposite direction.
The CHIPS and Science Act — which steered government grants and tax breaks to the semiconductor industry — succeeded because the administration partnered closely with industry experts and private-sector talent.
Defense innovation initiatives succeeded because they worked with startups and technologists. Industrial policy worked best when the government treated innovation as an asset to harness rather than a threat to contain.
That’s the lesson Democrats should take forward. The future of the Democratic Party should not be anti-tech populism. It should be pro-innovation progressivism: encouraging competition, protecting consumers and ensuring American technological leadership while still embracing guardrails where necessary.
Silicon Valley understands something the Democratic Party increasingly forgets: Innovation is messy, disruptive and occasionally arrogant. Yet it is absolutely essential to American prosperity and success.
If Democrats want to become the party of the future again, they need to stop treating the people building the future like political enemies.
READ NEXT
Defense tech has unleashed a new weapons boom in Southern California
Newsom’s populist act: Oppose state billionaire tax, embrace federal one