Republish
Coronavirus pandemic requires renewed focus by California policymakers on eldercare
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Coronavirus pandemic requires renewed focus by California policymakers on eldercare
Share this:
By Ed Dudensing, Special to CalMatters
Ed Dudensing is former Deputy District Attorney for Sacramento County who represents victims of nursing home neglect and abuse, and represented the plaintiffs in the case described in this article, ed@dudensinglaw.com.
For California’s seniors, the coronavirus pandemic is an especially terrifying crisis. For the state, it is also a powerful signal that gaping loopholes in protections for this vulnerable and growing population must change.
As a population, people over 70 tend to have weaker immune systems and more underlying conditions that impede their ability to fight the virus. They are also more likely to reside in group living situations, in close quarters. Waves of COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes — first in the Seattle area, then near Sacramento and now throughout the nation — have underscored this grim reality. So far, Californians over 65 have made up at least a quarter of the state’s confirmed cases of COVID-19.
But regulations, particularly for assisted living facilities, are perilously behind the curve in safeguarding California’s elders from this virus. Fortunately, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Master Plan on Aging initiative, currently underway, presents an opportunity to aggressively address this danger and take steps to protect millions of older Americans.
If you are over 65 or have an aging parent, you may already be familiar with this widespread issue. As baby boomers age in large numbers, families look for alternatives to traditional nursing homes for loved ones who are living longer. Assisted living centers present an attractive choice; they offer help with personal care and daily needs, including medication, but more resemble comfortable apartments — with private living spaces, active social interaction, movie nights, happy hours and other amenities.
Assisted living centers have been a boon to the eldercare industry and the large corporate owners that now dominate the market. At the same time, however, a lack of regulation and oversight of staffing levels and qualifications — especially requirements for on-site physicians and well-trained medical technicians — has left the industry vulnerable to abuse and tragic outcomes. One glaring issue that must be addressed: assisted living centers are regulated by the state Department of Social Services rather than the Department of Public Health.
But the reality is that assisted living is part of a health care and medical care delivery system, not merely a lifestyle choice. Among my clients is the family of a 77-year-old woman who choked to death in an assisted living facility — not a nursing home — after she was given the psychotropic drug Ativan to chemically restrain her. This tragedy resulted in a record $42.5-million verdict against a major assisted living chain, Eskaton.
Launched last year, Newsom’s Master Plan on Aging has formed an advisory committee, is holding public meetings and in the fall is scheduled to issue a 10-year plan that will address issues from housing and homelessness to emergency preparedness to abuse and neglect. The project has created an “Equity Committee” to receive input from a more diverse group of citizens and organizations, including representatives of the disabled community, Native Americans and other ethnic minorities.
In light of the spreading coronavirus public health crisis, it is imperative that the governor’s Master Plan on Aging takes on a broad and serious public policy role. We don’t need high-level platitudes for addressing the needs of the elderly. We need concrete policies, strong regulations with enforcement teeth and a commitment to sustained oversight.
We all hope and pray that the coronavirus will soon be controlled and subdued. And that when the crisis is behind us, that we continue the important work of protecting the elderly and other vulnerable segments of our citizenry.
_____
Ed Dudensing is former Deputy District Attorney for Sacramento County who represents victims of nursing home neglect and abuse, and represented the plaintiffs in the case described in this article, ed@dudensinglaw.com.