Republish
Once again, San Francisco officials are limiting public access to the majestic Hetch Hetchy Valley
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Once again, San Francisco officials are limiting public access to the majestic Hetch Hetchy Valley
Share this:
By Spreck Rosekrans, Special to CalMatters
Spreck Rosekrans is executive director of Restore Hetch Hetchy, spreck@hetchhetchy.org. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
In the waning moments of 2019, San Francisco’s Water Department persuaded Congress to deny long-promised access to unreachable areas of Yosemite National Park.
This power play would ban environmentally benign boating on Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. The move reverses the guarantees of improved access and recreation which San Francisco made in 1913, when it pleaded with Congress to pass the Raker Act and allow it to build the reservoir in Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park.
After trying for 20 years to get permission for a dam in Yosemite, San Francisco promised in 1913 that the Hetch Hetchy area would be managed for “water supply and park purposes,” and that any notion that visitors would be excluded was “absurd.”
During hearings on the bill, that dam’s proponents assured its author, Congressman John E. Raker, that the federal government would retain control and could allow boating.
In the course of promoting the legislation, San Francisco also made promises about roads, hotels, and campgrounds at Hetch Hetchy, none of which have come to fruition.
Today, only a single circuitous trail provides access to a small fraction of the valley’s perimeter. Only 1% of Yosemite’s visitors venture to Hetch Hetchy, a place pioneering naturalist John Muir described as a “rare landscape garden, one of nature’s finest mountain temples.”
Canoes, kayaks or an electric-powered, park-operated tour boat could provide access to the spectacular canyon. Hikers and picnickers of all ages could disembark at Tiltill Creek and leisurely stroll to Rancheria Falls.
Rock climbers would flock to Hetch Hetchy’s granite monoliths. And enthusiastic anglers would be able to fish for trout throughout the reservoir and in the free-flowing Tuolumne River just upstream.
But now, thanks to a last-minute tweak in the $1.4 trillion, 2,000-page spending bill passed by Congress shortly before the end of its 2019 session, those visitors may effectively be kept from exploring the Hetch Hetchy canyon.
The ban comes in a side report to the must-pass bill, not in the bill itself, so its legal standing is ambiguous. But San Francisco’s attempt to renege on its original promise is clear.
For a century, San Francisco’s Water Department has used Hetch Hetchy Valley as a storage tank and kept its gorgeous canyon almost entirely to itself. The access gate closes daily. Lodging is nonexistent and camping is unavailable. The only boat permitted on the water is San Francisco’s own.
The attempt to ban all boating is a response to the Department of Interior’s consideration of quiet, eco-friendly craft, not gasoline-powered boats like the one that San Francisco itself uses on the same water.
San Francisco’s excuse for wanting a boating ban is to protect the reservoir’s water quality. That’s a worthy and necessary goal. But many other urban water agencies in California and elsewhere allow boating on reservoirs without compromising water quality.
San Francisco’s bureaucrats simply want to limit access and recreation at Hetch Hetchy. They know that if park visitors are able to explore Hetch Hetchy’s spectacular terrain, many will want to see the reservoir emptied and water storage moved downstream, so the valley can be restored to its natural state. They are right.
Last minute congressional shenanigans are no way to determine how to treat a stunning landscape in one of our flagship national parks. The American public, including a new generation of San Franciscans, need to reexamine Hetch Hetchy and to determine its best use in the 21st century and beyond.
________
Spreck Rosekrans is executive director of Restore Hetch Hetchy, spreck@hetchhetchy.org. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.