Republish
Reform draconian late fees and fines for Bay Area bridge tolls
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Reform draconian late fees and fines for Bay Area bridge tolls
Share this:
By Anne Stuhldreher, Special to CalMatters
Anne Stuhldreher directs The Financial Justice Project in the treasurer’s office of the city and county of San Francisco, and is a fellow with the Aspen Institute’s Financial Security Program. She can be reached at Overcharged2021@gmail.com.
Paul Briley knew a bill was coming. He’d crossed the Bay Bridge a dozen times for work and to make sure his grandmother was taking her medicine. With bridge tolls at $6 a pop, he had a good idea how much he’d racked up.
But he’d recently moved from his home in San Francisco’s Bayview neighborhood, and the invoices weren’t reaching him. By the time they did, the scale of his debt had mutated into something truly shocking. Not only was each $6 toll saddled with a $25 fine, each one had a $45 late fee attached. Briley owed $912 on $72 in tolls – more than 12 times the original amount, more than a 1,000% mark-up, and more, much more than he could spare.
OVERCHARGED takes an inside look at how unfair fines and fees criminalize poverty in California. The series tells the stories of people reeling from this approach of raising revenue and the activists fighting for reform.
“I want to pay the tolls,” Briley said. “But I simply cannot afford that much.”
Who can? Studies show more than half of all Americans cannot afford an unexpected $400 emergency expense. And yet Briley and the thousands of Bay Area residents like him have few options.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which oversees the Bays’ toll bridges, does not offer payment plans – demanding instead that people pay off their debt all at once. If they cannot pay, they can be blocked from registering their vehicles, a draconian response that only makes it harder for poor people to get to work and to pay the debt that caused the problem in the first place.
It’s a state of affairs in need of hard scrutiny. Should a public agency charge late penalties that metastasize the original toll by 1,000% and drive already poor people deeper into debt? Should livelihoods be ruined if they cannot pay? Should the Metropolitan Transportation Commission pursue such policies even when they’re negligible to its bottom line?
Thankfully a coalition of organizations, including the San Francisco Financial Justice Project, GLIDE, and SPUR, is calling on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to exercise some common sense. An MTC subcommittee is considering the reforms at an Oct. 13 committee meeting. The coalition asserts that fines and late fees are blunt instruments that hit people very differently depending on the size of their wallets, yielding all kinds of unintended consequences.
In 2019, there were 5 million instances of unpaid tolls at Bay Area bridges resulting in violation notices, according to forthcoming research by SPUR, a nonprofit public policy organization in the Bay Area. More than 1 million of those violation letters went to just 20 ZIP codes in the nine-county Bay Area. These are ZIP codes that have higher poverty rates and more racial diversity. In San Francisco, the neighborhoods most disproportionately represented were Bayview and Hunters Point, two of the last remaining enclaves in the city with large Black populations.
Will our bridges go broke if they fix the class and racial inequity implicit in these penalties? Hardly. Less than 1% of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s budget comes from penalties for nonpayment. The penalties are classic “high pain, low gain” follies – inflicting hardship on vast numbers of struggling residents while bringing in very little to show for it.
What can be done instead? To begin, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission can build on reforms they implemented during the pandemic. To their credit, they suspended all late fines and fees during the pandemic and eliminated registration holds on people’s cars. A similar spirit of fairness is needed going forward.
The coalition of community organizations is calling on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to implement several solutions.
First, dramatically lower the $25 fine and eliminate the $45 late fee. No one should be forced to pay 10 times the original toll if they’re late or cannot afford it.
Second, put an end to slapping registration holds on people’s vehicles if they cannot pay off their debt. Undermining people’s ability to support themselves is too extreme a penalty for the infraction.
Third, bring the notification system into the 21st century and let people know they owe tolls by text and email as well as via letter.
And finally, offer free payment plans to people like Briley unable to pay a lump sum.
Other places have implemented similar reforms. Illinois recently cut its late fines on bridge tolls to $3. New York’s E-ZPass just created an app that allows people to receive notifications and pay tolls or fines on their phone. The San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency and San Francisco Traffic Court have each taken steps to make their fines and fees less punishing of the poor.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission is on record as wanting to do its part in creating a fairer world. In 2019, it adopted an equity platform that advocated advancing policies to “meaningfully reverse disparities” through “investments and policies” directed at “people with low incomes and communities of color.” There is no better way for the commission to give meaning to those words than by taking action to implement these reforms.
At the Oct. 13 meeting, I hope the committee explores larger questions as well. Should the poorest among us pay the same amount to get to work? A $6 toll fee takes a bigger bite out of a minimum-wage paycheck than that of a tech worker.
And let’s remember who is crossing the bridge these days and paying the tolls. Not people like me who have the privilege of working from home. It’s people who have to go in – it’s people who work at schools and restaurants and are essential workers. They deserve better than this. And we can do better by them.
other articles in the overcharged series
Changing unfair fines and fees that can derail the lives of people who can’t afford to pay
High-priced jail phone calls: $15 to talk to your daughter
Why child support fails California’s kids in poverty
California needs to get rid of high pain/low gain court fees
California’s jaywalking laws need to be walked back