California’s cap-and-trade program is a successful part of the state’s efforts to combat climate change. Even during periods of economic hardship, the program supports the state’s climate goals with carbon prices that increase every year, and other well-designed market rules. The recession induced by COVID-19 has resulted in a significantly less demand for energy, one factor leading to reduced greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, there is less demand for carbon allowances.
The low volume of carbon allowances sold in the May auction was an outlier. Notably, the two auctions preceding the economic crisis were robust. The results of one auction do not mean the program is broken and needs fixing.
Imposing needless program changes as a result of one carbon auction will adversely affect energy affordability, increasing consumer costs at precisely the worst time.
Results of May auction in cap-and-trade do not mean the program is broken
Share this:
In summary
Imposing needless program changes as a result of one carbon auction will adversely affect energy affordability and increase consumer costs.
By Frank Harris
Frank Harris is the manager of Energy Regulatory Policy at the California Municipal Utilities Association.
Re “It’s time to fix California’s cap-and-trade – again”; Commentary, May 29, 2020
California’s cap-and-trade program is a successful part of the state’s efforts to combat climate change. Even during periods of economic hardship, the program supports the state’s climate goals with carbon prices that increase every year, and other well-designed market rules. The recession induced by COVID-19 has resulted in a significantly less demand for energy, one factor leading to reduced greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, there is less demand for carbon allowances.
The low volume of carbon allowances sold in the May auction was an outlier. Notably, the two auctions preceding the economic crisis were robust. The results of one auction do not mean the program is broken and needs fixing.
Imposing needless program changes as a result of one carbon auction will adversely affect energy affordability, increasing consumer costs at precisely the worst time.
Frank Harris is the manager of Energy Regulatory Policy at the California Municipal Utilities Association.
We want to hear from you
Want to submit a guest commentary or reaction to an article we wrote? You can find our submission guidelines here. Please contact CalMatters with any commentary questions: commentary@calmatters.org