Republish
Proposal to prohibit police unions from contributing to DA campaigns violates our First Amendment rights
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Proposal to prohibit police unions from contributing to DA campaigns violates our First Amendment rights
Share this:
By Marshall E. McClain, Los Angeles
Marshall E. McClain is president and CEO of the Airport Peace Officers Association.
Re “Proposal to prohibit police unions from funding district attorney campaigns doesn’t go far enough”; Commentary, June 5, 2020
On June 1, a coalition of current and former elected prosecutors sent a letter calling on the California State Bar to prohibit police and law enforcement unions from contributing to campaigns of prosecutors who are running for election within their jurisdictions. These district attorneys and prosecutors of California say that police union contributions are made only with the goal of currying favor from the prosecutors to protect bad behavior by officers. This is a disingenuous double standard. We do not see the same ban suggested for Black Lives Matter or the American Conservative Union Foundation, both of which proclaim strong positions on policing in America.
As the president of Los Angeles Airport Peace Officers Association, we find it offensive that police unions are singled out to curb our First Amendment rights by suggesting we should be banned from contributing to any elected office holders – most notably prosecutor positions. LAAPOA’s members and I do believe that as citizens and as specialized police in the nation’s second busiest airport, where we are on the front lines of safety and security at LAX and Van Nuys, we have the right and perhaps the obligation to be active citizens in elections.
Disallowing these contributions from police unions is a clear attempt to silence our collective voice on who represents our community in different levels of government, and, again, is a violation of our First Amendment rights. Under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Citizens United case, unions can spend the money on materials in support of, or in opposition to, a candidate for office, much like any individual can. A move to ban our participation in the electoral process would only disenfranchise LAAPOA’s majority-minority police force in a time when our country is reckoning with policing and racial divisions in our politics. It is necessary that our voice be heard and considered at all levels of government, just as those voices who criticize us are.
LAAPOA does seek an active role in the outcomes we want to see in our community and nation, and being able to participate in the political process is an important way to be part of the conversation where everyone’s voice is considered. To pick and choose who can be part of the political process does not represent the values our country created to uphold equal participation for all citizens.