Republish
Alternative proposal to Electoral College could make matters worse
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Alternative proposal to Electoral College could make matters worse
Share this:
By Howard Wayne, San Diego
Howard Wayne is a former Assemblymember of the California Legislature, an attorney and an adjunct professor at the University of San Diego.
Re “Abolish the Electoral College or award electors on a proportional basis”; Commentary, Sept. 21, 2020
Jessica Levinson and Michael Genovese have written an excellent critique of the Electoral College. They point out “it vastly reduces the voting power of voters in larger states.” Going to a national popular vote would solve that problem. Their alternative proposal would not solve that problem and could make matters worse.
First, because the same calculation for the number of electoral votes a state receives would not be changed, the system would still reduce the voting power of voters in larger states.
Second, they argue states could award electoral votes on a proportional basis as used by Maine and Nebraska. However, those states do not award electoral votes on a proportional basis, but on who wins each congressional district. Utilizing this system would exacerbate the effects of gerrymandering. While Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, Donald Trump won 230 of 435 congressional districts.
Third, if California awarded electoral votes on a proportional basis, but states like Alabama and Texas did not, our impact on the national election would be diminished as compared to states that utilized winner take all.