Republish
Thankfully, governor vetoed bill to reform the recall process
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Thankfully, governor vetoed bill to reform the recall process
Share this:
By Bob Mulholland, Chico
Bob Mulholland is a Democratic operative in California, a campaign adviser for the California Democratic Party from 1991-2010, and a Democratic National Committee member from 1991-2020.
Re “Reform the recall process; make it honest”; Commentary, Sept. 22, 2021
I, along with many local grassroot organizers, thank the governor for vetoing Sen. Josh Newman’s Senate Bill 660.
SB 660 is the Democrats’ version of voter suppression. Many people of color on the edge of society collect signatures, at times that are convenient for themselves for a few extra bucks. SB 660 would subject them, when police are called by some store owners, to being fined $25,000 because they were paying people for each signature.
For decades I have organized signature drives. Local referendums must be done within 30 days, so a local group has to move quickly, sometimes having college students collect signatures for a dollar or two each. They choose the hours and sites. SB 660 would have required a business to be set up with accountants, election attorneys with federal and state taxes, Social Security, etc. be deducted before any initiative, referendum and/or recall was started.
With all the problems of COVID-19, wildfires, the economy, schools, crime, unemployment, homelessness, upcoming elections, it is amazing that the Legislature had extra time on its hands to push a bill that three governors have vetoed – Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom.
Big industries, whether it’s insurance, health care, oil, tobacco or the Proposition 22 folks, can always qualify Initiatives or referendums, either statewide or local. It is the “small business” activists that would be shut down by SB 660. Uber can qualify whatever it wants under any rules, but under SB 660 type rules, Uber drivers and local community groups could not.
Let’s focus on the people’s business instead of a proposal already vetoed six times.