Republish
California is failing its students. Where is the outrage?
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

California is failing its students. Where is the outrage?
Share this:
By Dean Drescher, Special to CalMatters
Dean Drescher is the policy director at EdVoice, a nonprofit advocating to eliminate inequality of educational opportunity in California public schools, Dean@edvoice.org. She wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
There has been radio silence from California’s public education leadership after the recent release of the National Assessment for Educational Progress scores, otherwise known as the Nation’s Report Card.
The National Assessment for Educational Progress, considered the gold standard in educational testing, is a low-stakes test that has been administered in the United States since the late 1960s.
It’s the largest and most continuous nationally representative assessment of what American kids know. It’s also how the public can draw apples-to-apples comparisons about how kids are doing across different states.
Californians are facing grim results, but this isn’t the case for all states. Mississippi made gains in fourth grade reading. Louisiana was first in the nation in for gains in eighth grade math. And, in addition to celebrating the World Series victory, Washington, D.C. can celebrate that it has made the largest gains of anyone in fourth grade reading in the three decades that it has administered the National Assessment for Educational Progress. And its students in poverty now consistently perform higher than similar California students.
In California, eighth grade scores fell in both reading and math. Los Angeles Unified scores fell by the most of any of the urban districts across the country. California ranks at the bottom of the nation in reading and math for fourth and eighth graders, but at the top of the nation in the size of its achievement gaps. This is, indeed, a crisis. So what are the state’s education leaders saying?
Crickets.
While the subgroups of students who have historically been above grade level continue to do well, many groups of California students, including ones the Local Control Funding Formula promised to help, are struggling.
California’s low-income fourth graders rank 48th in the country, above only West Virginia, Alabama and Alaska. The gap between white and black students increased in fourth and eighth grade math. Hispanic eighth graders’ math scores rank 44th in the country.
None of that elicited even a tweet from the California Department of Education.
California invested over $90 billion in the public education system this year alone. New task forces have been created. New departments within the California Department of Education have been proposed.
And the only breaking news this cycle was California Collaborative for Educational Excellence, an arm of the state dedicated to school improvement, is investing in a new website. But what’s the word on a plan to fix what is clearly not working for students?
California’s children who just took the National Assessment for Educational Progress are the future of this state. They deserve leaders who are boldly advocating for their future and making noise about equity of opportunity.
Policy leaders have been loud and clear stressing patience and incremental improvement and cheerleading increased funding. But California’s children, the majority of whom live in poverty, cannot sit and wait at the bottom of the nation’s barrel. They deserve more than crickets.
_____
Dean Drescher is the policy director at EdVoice, a nonprofit advocating to eliminate inequality of educational opportunity in California public schools, Dean@edvoice.org. She wrote this commentary for CalMatters.