Republish
Turning off power to combat wildfires could harm the very people who need protection
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Turning off power to combat wildfires could harm the very people who need protection
Share this:
By Joie Acosta and Regina Shih, Special to CalMatters
Joie Acosta and Regina Shih are both senior behavioral scientists at the nonprofit, nonpartisan RAND Corporation, jacosta@rand.org and rshih@rand.org. They wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
California utility companies are increasingly triggering power outages by their own accord to try to prevent wildfires. But the practice may endanger elderly people and individuals with power-dependent medical devices.
While intentionally shutting off power may be a practical way to prevent power lines from sparking wildfires, is it worth the risks?
Indeed, planned power outages may be hurting the very populations they seek to protect.
California has had the 10 costliest wildland fires in the United States, with damage ranging from $1.3 billion to $10.5 billion.
These wildfires disproportionately affected older adults because older adults are more likely than other age groups to be socially isolated, to face challenges with evacuating, and to have chronic health conditions.
Likewise, when the power gets turned off to prevent wildfires, older adults are likely to be at-risk for injury or death. While the impacts on individuals unprepared for a power outage are unknown, other weather events indicate that health risks for the elderly are significant.
For example, during 2017’s Hurricane Irma, the most common causes of death were related to power outages that exacerbated existing medical issues. Among the power-outage-related deaths, most were heat-related deaths of older adults, followed by a much smaller number of deaths among patients on electricity dependent medical treatment, such as ventilators and dialysis machines.
Within California there are at least 176,483 electricity dependent individuals.
Despite the fact that these individuals are unlikely to be enrolled in a registry with their county or city or with their electric company, this population is frequently included in public health and health care emergency plans, where they receive education on how to create a personal preparedness plan to best preserve medications and, in some instances, access back-up power generators.
However, the same is not true for older adults, particularly those who are aging in place. There is no national level agency identified in policy or by legal frameworks that is directly accountable for older adults’ protection and resilience.
Nearly 6 million Californians are over 65 years of age. This is the fastest growing population in California.
By 2030, there will be 10.9 million older Californians. most of whom are likely to prefer aging in place if national surveys are any indication.
This presents a challenge for public health authorities: how and who should locate older adults during emergencies. This should also be a consideration for utility companies.
Utility companies are most likely to order a power outage to prevent wildfires on days with high heat, high winds, and low humidity. Yet even short periods of extreme heat caused by lack of air conditioning can aggravate health conditions, as older adults are less heat tolerant, may rely on refrigerated medication, and are therefore at an increased risk of heat-related morbidity and mortality.
With the large and growing population of older adults, an expected increase in the frequency and intensity of hot days due to climate change, and the possibility that power outages can last for up to five days, planned power outages to prevent wildfires could have grave public health implications for older adults.
Our prior research suggests public health and emergency management departments within states rarely coordinate when it comes to preparing older adult, disabled, or medical device-dependent populations for weather-related disasters.
There also appears to be a lack of communication and planning with the private sector for intentional power outages. This is a potentially disastrous recipe.
California law requires that electric utilities make attempts to notify and coordinate with local communities before and after a shutdown event. Reaching older adults, particularly those aging in place, will require a new type of outreach by public health authorities.
Public health authorities, in partnership with utility companies and emergency management agencies, could rely on existing aging-in-place efforts to locate and reach older adults.
For instance, there are almost 400 communities enrolled in AARP’s Age-Friendly Network. And more than 200 villages in 45 states and the District of Columbia that facilitate social support and community connections for older adults.
Groups such as these can bring critical expertise on the needs of and access to older adults across the spectrum, from those with multiple vulnerabilities to those that are high functioning. This expertise is needed to ensure that older adults are protected during planned as well as unplanned power outages.
We recently designed a toolkit based on our research to promote older adults’ resilience and to provide operational guidance on aligning public health departments with other agencies to protect the health and well-being of older adults; utility companies might also benefit from these collaborations.
Older people stand to suffer when the power goes out. Until more thoughtful and comprehensive decisions are made, planned power outages need to be planned better.
—
Joie Acosta and Regina Shih are both senior behavioral scientists at the nonprofit, nonpartisan RAND Corporation, jacosta@rand.org and rshih@rand.org. They wrote this commentary for CalMatters.