Republish
Tax hike on employers isn’t necessary as state enjoys revenue windfall
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Tax hike on employers isn’t necessary as state enjoys revenue windfall
Share this:
By Peter Blocker, Special to CalMatters
Peter Blocker is vice president of Policy for the California Taxpayers Association, PBlocker@caltax.org.
California’s state government has so much money it could be constitutionally required to give taxpayers a rebate, so it’s somewhat surprising that a group of lawmakers continues to push for a multibillion-dollar tax hike on employers.
Assembly Bill 71 would impose a $2.4 billion-a-year tax increase on businesses, including a corporate income tax rate increase that equates to an 8.6% tax hike on companies doing business in this state. Other provisions would undermine a law that keeps California from taxing income earned by out-of-state businesses for activities that take place outside California – an important policy that keeps tax wars from erupting between California and our international trading partners.
The bill even includes a retroactive tax increase – one that would reach back to a one-time event in 2017-18 when many companies brought income to the United States from other countries. Taxing companies that repatriate income would put U.S.-based companies doing business in California at a substantial disadvantage to foreign corporations that don’t bring income back to the United States. Imposing the tax retroactively makes the flawed policy even more damaging.
The tax revenue would be dedicated to programs intended to reduce homelessness, but there is no guarantee that it wouldn’t simply lead to a shuffling of tax dollars already being used for the same purpose.
There is no doubt that homelessness is a serious, complex problem that deserves real, comprehensive solutions. But an unnecessary tax increase would create new problems rather than solutions.
California has budget reserves of $22 billion (including $15.6 billion in the Rainy Day Fund) and an estimated $15 billion windfall from higher-than-anticipated tax revenue. In December alone, the state collected $3 billion more than it expected.
Considering the windfall and the fact that California businesses already have been pushed to the edge of the abyss by the pandemic, it is an especially inappropriate time for talk of a tax increase.
Under existing rates, California businesses pay some of the highest taxes in the country. Our corporate income tax rate is the highest among the Western states and one of the highest in the nation. According to the Washington, D.C.-based Tax Foundation, California’s overall business tax climate ranks second-worst in the United States.
High taxes have real-world effects. When corporate income taxes rise, the only way for businesses to reduce costs is through a reduction in operational expenses – lower wages or reducing their footprint in California. Businesses also pass the cost of new taxes to consumers whenever possible, so tax increases affect all of us.
After comparing costs in California and other states, employers of all sizes took jobs and investments out of the Golden State in the past few years. The exodus included Silicon Valley giants that were pioneers in the technological revolution, pivotal in one of our state’s signature industries. Other companies can’t feasibly leave the state entirely, but are minimizing their California operations as much as possible.
While the loss of jobs has been making headlines recently, it is not a new phenomenon. A report by Spectrum Location Solutions estimated that from 2008 to 2016, approximately 13,000 companies disinvested in the state and nearly $77 billion in capital was diverted to other states and nations.
The loss of companies and their employees has a long-term impact on government revenue, causes unemployment for workers who can’t move to the new location and reduces opportunities for Californians seeking jobs at all levels.
Californians are sensitive to this problem, as illustrated by a Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll that found 78% of likely voters agree that “taxes in California were already so high that they were driving many people and businesses out of the state.”
Every problem our government faces is easier to solve when jobs are plentiful and the economy is growing, and more difficult when employers are heading for the exits. Rather than pursuing a damaging and unnecessary tax increase, lawmakers should focus on jobs and growth.
A thriving economy is the best source of growing revenue for important government programs, including those that can help struggling Californians find permanent shelter and security.