Republish
Without statewide testing data California will fall short in supporting student learning
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Without statewide testing data California will fall short in supporting student learning
Share this:
By Paul Keefer, Special to CalMatters
Paul Keefer is the Area 3 Trustee for the Sacramento County Board of Education, pkeefer@scoe.net.
The learning loss resulting from the pandemic is well documented. McKinsey & Company, a management consulting firm, described the disproportional impacts to students of color, and we know the divide deepens in low-income communities and in rural areas that suffer from broadband issues.
How can we work to rectify the growing education equity gap in California when we don’t have current data about how students are doing academically?
At stake is the annual California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress that students in grades 3-8 and 11 take each year. This statewide test provides detailed information about students’ academic acumen and is used to assess proficiency in English language arts and math. In 2020, the assessment test was not administered due to the unprecedented shuttering of in-person instruction across the state.
Now, in the second school year in the midst of the pandemic, California students are caught in the middle of a battle being fought by the California Department of Education and deep-pocketed interest groups such as the California Teachers Association.
When the federal government announced that it is requiring state testing, the California Department of Education unanimously approved the use of “shorter standardized tests in English language arts and math this spring, creating a path for collecting critical student data amidst COVID-19 uncertainties.”
Not surprisingly, the California Teachers Association disagrees with administering the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress test this year and has asked for a second suspension of the assessment.
If we do not have a mechanism to determine students’ learning other than grades, which can be subjective, how will we know how our students are actually faring? How much further behind will California students fall if we take two years off from administering individual student assessments?
Students who are marginalized are clearly identified through California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress data on the California School Dashboard. We already know that California students in grades four and eight are performing well below average of all states in language arts and mathematics as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress. I’d like to think that hasn’t worsened during the pandemic, but there is no way to know without statewide testing.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress scores for 11th grade students are used for the Early Assessment Program through the California State University system for proper college placement in mathematics and language arts. In 2020, thousands of 11th grade students did not have Early Assessment Program results available which is one piece of the equation for declining college enrollment.
By assessing California students this spring using the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress we will be able to determine:
We will also have Early Assessment Program data to successfully support college-bound students. This is critical as the National Student Clearinghouse® Research Center found that “public college enrollment among graduates of low-income high schools declined at disproportionately higher rates, revealing impediments to college access during COVID-19.”
As we reel from the effects of the pandemic, we should not abandon data-driven decisions. Quantitative California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress data is needed to ensure that under-performing schools get the resources they need, and that charter schools have accurate data to submit to their authorizer as they work through the new charter renewal process established under AB 1505.
As teachers and administrators start to make plans for the 2021-22 school year, they need concrete data so they can make informed decisions about funding allocations, interventions and student supports so that all California students can succeed. If political pressure amounts to not administering the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress test we will be blind to these important data points and students will suffer.