Republish
New path on California water must include Delta communities
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

New path on California water must include Delta communities
Share this:
By Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla
Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla is executive director of Restore the Delta, barbara@restorethedelta.org. She wrote this commentary for CALmatters.
Editor’s note: This commentary is a response to “Finally, a new path toward managing water, rivers and the Delta,” March 19, 2019.
Delta advocates agree about the need to break out of our silos. And we all agree, the Delta is an amazing estuary, and a vital water supply source for the state.
But any new path on California water must bring Delta community and fishing interests to the table. We have solutions to offer. We live with the impacts of state water management decisions from loss of recreation to degradation of water quality to collapsing fisheries.
For example, how can new and improved technology be employed to track real time management of fisheries?
State Water Resources Control Board members have suggested camera technology to track fish in real time. That’s an idea we believe is worth pursuing. We also see opportunities to investigate the possibility of re-engineering the Delta Cross Channel Gates using bubble curtains for fish.
Can satellite technology better track water use and movement of fisheries and wildlife along our waterways and connecting lands? All these proposals are worthy of exploration.
However, any agreements for moving blocks of water from Northern California to State Water Contractors via the Delta should involve the impacted parties.
To date, not one party from the Delta has been invited to observe, let alone participate in, the voluntary settlement agreements. How, when and from where this water is moved has impacts on the Delta watershed and its tributaries and connected groundwater basins.
How can we determine if this is a good or bad idea if it is negotiated in secret? State Water Contractors have a history of keeping impacted parties out of the room. This needs to end.
Water is habitat for fisheries and it doesn’t flow in blocks. When and how it is released from or withheld in dams, in addition to its volume, alters flow conditions for fisheries.
Regulatory standards for water transfers, flows, and water quality are not old-fashioned notions to be simply done away with for some arbitrary, non-measurable standards of water quality and water quantity in the Delta. Knowing and measuring on-the-ground conditions is essential for improving Delta management.
Now that Gov. Gavin Newsom has altered Jerry Brown’s twin tunnels proposal, let’s restart this process and bring all stakeholders to the table. That’s how a democracy is supposed to work.