Republish
If budget represents our values, we must protect California’s most vulnerable
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

If budget represents our values, we must protect California’s most vulnerable
Share this:
By Jim Frazier, Special to CalMatters
Assemblyman Jim Frazier is a Democrat who represents Assembly District 11, in Solano, Contra Costa and Sacramento counties, Jim.Frazier@asm.ca.gov. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.
When California’s economy is strong, like it was in January, passing the state’s annual budget was a pleasant responsibility. Ample tax dollars and a significant surplus meant that most policy priorities received funding and those programs warranting increases received them.
However, with California now facing near record unemployment and the state’s surplus now in deficit, budgeting becomes a more solemn exercise. What’s before us today is a statement of our collective values and priorities.
In his May Budget Revise, Gov. Gavin Newsom reduced his initial $222 billion January budget to $203 billion. The reduction is a testament to the economic havoc wrought by COVID-19.
The administration’s revised budget would cut $500 million to Medicaid-funded intellectual and developmental disabilities services unless Congress passes additional aid to states, and that federal legislation specifically allocates further federal Medicaid funds to California. These cuts would devastate the more than 350,000 Californians with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.
For two decades, California has underfunded the developmental disability system. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a state rate study identified a funding gap of more than $1.4 billion for disability programs. The COVID-19 public health crisis has made this problem worse, significantly increasing the cost of safely delivering services to those with developmental disabilities.
Newsom has said that budgets represent a statement of our values. I agree. As the Newsom administration and the Legislature enter the final stretch of budget negotiations, our state leaders must make a commitment to protect vital support services for those populations who need them most but cannot advocate for themselves.
Protecting individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities is personal. I chair the Select Committee on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, where we work diligently to shine a light on the population of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, one of the most underserved groups in California.
The administration’s proposed cuts threaten the stability of Medicaid-funded provider services that keep people with intellectual and developmental disabilities safe and healthy during normal times, made all the more important during the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Californians with developmental disabilities are at higher risk for COVID-19 infection and complications. Maintaining the essential safety net of services, equipped to meet their unique needs, should be a priority for state funding during this public health crisis.
Before COVID-19, many children and adults with disabilities were on waitlists for services and housing. More than 28,000 programs have closed during the last decade. All too frequently, the staff providing essential services are paid poverty-level wages.
The Legislature’s approved budget maintains critical funding for health and human service programs, including programs targeted toward people with intellectual and developmental disabilities – infants, those in independent living, senior citizens and others. It also focuses on using state reserves to minimize these cuts.
Our budget approach provides flexibility. Where the Newsom administration’s budget recommends cuts now with the hope of restoring them if Congress does the right thing, the Legislature took a different approach. We fund important programs like intellectual and developmental disabilities and public education now and will consider what the future looks like when we get a better understanding of what state tax revenue and federal funding looks like in the next couple of months.
In the big picture, $500 million represents a rounding error in a $200-billion state budget; however, for the infants, children, seniors and their families, large funding cuts represent quality of life changes and, in some circumstances, life or death.
On top of the many pressures the governor faces on a daily basis, this year’s budget went from surplus to deficit in the span of three months. Newsom, thank you for everything you do. With the health and economic impacts of the pandemic, we must do everything we can to take care of society’s most vulnerable. I urge you to support the Legislature’s budget and our approach to protecting the most vulnerable Californians.
_____
Assemblyman Jim Frazier is a Democrat who represents Assembly District 11, in Solano, Contra Costa and Sacramento counties, Jim.Frazier@asm.ca.gov. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.