Republish
Referendum against ban on flavored tobacco is a referendum against our kids
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Referendum against ban on flavored tobacco is a referendum against our kids
Share this:
By Monica Caffey, Special to CalMatters
Monica Caffey is chair of the San Bernardino Behavioral Health Commission, monicadistrict4@gmail.com. She is also an advocate with PAVe, a national organization founded by concerned moms in response to youth vaping.
Last year, the California Legislature passed the toughest law in the nation to protect kids like mine from getting hooked on Big Tobacco’s menthol cigarettes and sugary-sweet, candy-flavored e-cigarettes. As a parent and a volunteer advocate for Parents Against Vaping E-cigarettes, I felt like I could finally breathe a sigh of relief.
The feeling was short-lived. A month before this life-saving law was set to take effect, the tobacco industry submitted signatures to reverse this measure through a referendum on the 2022 statewide ballot.
Candy-flavored products hook kids on nicotine. Tobacco companies know this. Using flavors like cotton candy, bubble gum and gummy bears, they have created an epidemic of e-cigarette use among our youth. One in five high school students now use vape products and 81% who have ever used a tobacco product started with a flavored one.
As chair of the Behavioral Health Commission of San Bernardino County, I know that in addition to harming teens’ developing lungs, these tobacco products contain enormous amounts of nicotine that completely rewire adolescents’ developing brains, creating irreversible cognitive changes and potentially leading to years of further addiction.
As an African-American mother to two teenagers, I’m particularly concerned about the sharp rise in popularity of menthol vapes. Teens who vape are four times more likely to turn to combustible cigarettes, migrating to whatever flavored products are available. We already know that 90% of Afrian American smokers choose menthol, mostly because Big Tobacco has spent millions to target Black consumers – leading to generational nicotine addiction and disproportionate rates of death from cardiovascular disease in our community.
It’s the simple reason why hundreds of parents, organizations and students who battled Big Tobacco to enact California’s flavored tobacco restrictions are committed to defeating this referendum: our children’s lives and their health hangs in the balance.
The last time these companies picked a fight with voters in 2016, they lost by a whopping 29 percentage points when Californians approved a $2 per pack tax on cigarettes and vape products. No matter how much money the tobacco industry spends to deceive the public about the deadly risk of using its products, voters increasingly see through their cloud of lies to embrace the truth.
Regardless, Big Tobacco continues to return to its old tricks: lying to voters.
Last month, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Heart Association, Parents Against Vaping E-Cigarettes and other tobacco control groups called for an investigation of paid signature gatherers who were misleading voters about the referendum. Petition circulators told voters that their signature would help stop kids from buying flavored tobacco when, in fact, the opposite is true.
This referendum must not be allowed to qualify until these issues are thoroughly investigated and resolved.
If the referendum proceeds, California’s flavor ban is effectively delayed for 22 months. Meanwhile, the tobacco industry will make $1.1 billion – $1.64 million per day – from menthol cigarette sales alone. More importantly, 37,000 high school students will become e-cigarette users and many will become Big Tobacco customers for life.
The stakes of this fight could not be higher. As we fight for our kids, tobacco companies will try to convince us their candy-flavored tobacco products aren’t aimed directly at kids. By upholding California’s tobacco flavor ban, we will help young people break free from tobacco, prevent more kids from ever becoming addicted and protect a generation from suffering a lifetime of health consequences.
Let’s stop Big Tobacco from cashing in while killing our kids. It’s time to turn the tables and put Big Tobacco in a box.