Republish
Prop. 25 is dangerous for victims and communities
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer āBy Author Name, CalMatters.ā If youāre republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use āBy Author Name, Special for CalMatters.ā
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the storyās text, include this copy: āThis story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: āThis commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.ā If youāre republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, āyesterdayā can be changed to ālast week,ā and āAlameda Countyā to āAlameda County, Californiaā or āhere.ā
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: āAdditional reporting by [Your Publication]ā and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as āfor CalMattersā may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If youād like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if youāre interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? Weād love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Prop. 25 is dangerous for victims and communities
Share this:
By Patricia Wenskunas, Special to CalMatters
Patricia Wenskunas is the Founder/CEO of Crime Survivors Inc., patriciawenskunas@gmail.com.
Standing up for crime victims in California is no easy task. Often, the debates over our criminal justice system ignore victims who are the very people most personally affected by crime. Sadly Proposition 25 is just the latest example.
Prop. 25 proposes eliminating the constitutional right to choose bail or one of the many pretrial release programs in California counties with a new, unproven automated computer system. Under the proposed system, algorithms and predictive modeling will replace a judgeās discretion in determining whether a defendant is jailed awaiting trial or released into the community with few restrictions.
These are the same algorithmic-based predictive modeling tools that help people discover new music or television shows. Using them to decide who goes free from jail is a recipe for disaster.
Unless rejected by voters, itās obvious Prop. 25 will be bad for crime victims, local communities and even for civil rights. Thatās why a broad coalition ranging from our organization, Crime Survivors Inc., to law enforcement to the NAACP have lined up to oppose Prop. 25.
By eliminating bail and reducing accountability for defendants, Prop. 25 strips our courts of their most important tool to ensure defendants appear in court and hold them accountable if they donāt.
California has already had a preview of what life might be like under Prop. 25. Much of the state instituted āzero bailā during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Orange County, of the 1,635 defendants released under āzero bailā from April to August, nearly one-third were rearrested for new crimes while on release. Many individuals were rearrested multiple times after release, with one individual arrested six additional times.
Without accountability, these individuals are just continuing to commit crimes.
Results have been similar for other jurisdictions who have eliminated bail around the United States. A recent study by the University of Utah examined a 2017 pretrial release program in Cook County, Illinois, which is home to Chicago. The study concluded āthe number of released defendants charged with committing new crimes increased by 45%. And, more concerning, the number of pretrial releasees charged with committing new violent crimes increased by an estimated 33%.ā Equally disturbing, it also found a substantial drop in domestic violence prosecutions potentially due to defendantsā ability to intimidate their victims while on release.
Iām very concerned that Prop. 25 needlessly exposes victims to harassment from their perpetrators and even future crimes. There is nothing more traumatic than recovering after being a victim of crime. Prop. 25 creates a system where offenders can be released quickly with little protection afforded to their victims.
Replacing our current bail system with an unproven pretrial release program will also prove to be costly to taxpayers. New Jersey has a population smaller than Los Angeles County and spent $125 million in just the first year to implement a similar system. California will pay hundreds of millions of dollars to implement Prop. 25 even as state and local governments grapple with record budget deficits. All to pay for unreliable risk assessment systems that will use predictive analytics to make high-stakes decisions on public safety.
Ironically, these same predictive analytics have proven to enhance racial bias when used for applications for loans or credit. Prop. 25 will likely produce a similar result if used within the criminal justice system. So even while some offenders are released, African Americans, Latinos and other minorities may be disproportionately held awaiting trial for days or weeks even if they arenāt a public safety risk.
Prop. 25 manages to achieve an incredible feat. It makes communities less safe, even while enhancing racial bias and costing taxpayers. Prop. 25 is not progress. Itās a step backward that will make California less safe for all of us.
This November, vote No on Prop. 25.
_____
CalMatters Guide to the propositions: Proposition 25: Abolishing cash bail